This is an outdated version published on 2024-05-08 07:40:19 UTC. Read the most recent version.
Preprint / Version 5

A discussion on the hypothesis that the universe is a black hole

Approaches from Newtonian mechanics and Special relativity

##article.authors##

  • Masato Yamawaki National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Research Institute for Measurement and Analytical Instrumentation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51094/jxiv.63

Keywords:

black hole, Schwarzschild radius, event horizon, Newtonian mechanics, Special relativity, redshift, Big Bang

Abstract

Various cosmological models have been proposed even in this modern day, but this time we discussed  an unique hypothesis that "the universe is a huge black hole" using Newtonian mechanics and Special relativity. The black hole universe model was interpreted by considering that the shift of event horizon depending on the potential of the observation point, and the mass of the observable universe was estimated at 1.03 × 1053 kg. Furthermore, the following interpretations were obtained from this discussion. The redshift of distant stars is gravitational redshift, not due to Doppler shift. And inflation of the universe means that the Schwarzschild radius is expanding, not necessarily that the stars are moving away from each other.

Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

There are no conflicts of interest to disclose regarding this manuscript.

Downloads *Displays the aggregated results up to the previous day.

Download data is not yet available.

References

The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration et al., The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 875:L1 (2019), https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7

NASA, https://webb.nasa.gov/

R. A. Alpher, H. Bethe and G. Gamow, Physical Review, 73, 803-804 (1948), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.73.803

Nikodem J. Popławski, General Relativity and Gravitation, 53, 18 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-021-02790-7

須藤靖(2022)、宇宙は数式でできている、朝日新聞出版、ISBN 978-4-02-295160-1 ※https://dot.asahi.com/dot/2022022500042.html?page=1

A. Sneppen, Scientific Reports, 11, 14247 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93595-w

Paul Davies (2007), The Goldilocks Enigma, First Mariner Books, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, ISBN 978-0618592265

ESA, https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/Planck/Planck_reveals_an_almost_perfect_Universe

A. Einstein, Annalen der Physik, 322, 10, 891–921 (1905), https://doi.org/10.1002%2Fandp.19053221004

K. Schwarzschild, Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 7, 189–196 (1916) ※シュバルツシルト半径 | 天文学辞典 (astro-dic.jp)

E. Hubble, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 15, 3, 168-173 (1929), https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.15.3.168

I. S. Gradshteyn, I. M. Ryzhik and A. Jeffrey (2007), Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 7th ed. Cambridge, MA, USA: Academic Press, ISBN978-0-12-373637-6 ※無理関数の原始関数の一覧 - Wikipedia

岡村定矩 監訳(2003)、オックスフォード天文学辞典、朝倉書店、ISBN 4-254-15017-2

大須賀健(2011)、ゼロからわかるブラックホール、講談社、ISBN978-4-06-257728-1

日本アイソトープ協会(2021)、放射線取扱の基礎、丸善出版、ISBN 4890732837

H. A. Bethe, Reviews of Modern Physics, 62, 801-866 (1990), https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.62.801

F. Hoyle, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 108, 5, 372–382 (1948), https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/108.5.372

C. Jönsson, Zeitschrift für Physik, 161, 454–474 (1961), https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01342460

Posted


Submitted: 2022-05-05 20:20:45 UTC

Published: 2022-05-17 08:11:13 UTC — Updated on 2024-05-08 07:40:19 UTC

Versions

Reason(s) for revision

This manuscript has added the section "5.3 Integration of Newtonian mechanics and special relativity" to manuscript version 4. Accordingly, the second half of "6.3 Inflation Model" has also been revised. Other minor corrections were made to the text and figures.
Section
Earth science & Astronomy