A discussion on the hypothesis that the universe is a black hole
Approaches from Newtonian mechanics and Special relativity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51094/jxiv.63Keywords:
black hole, Schwarzschild radius, event horizon, Newtonian mechanics, Special relativity, redshift, Big BangAbstract
Various cosmological models have been proposed even in this modern day, but this time we discussed an unique hypothesis that "the universe is a huge black hole" using Newtonian mechanics and Special relativity. The black hole universe model was interpreted by considering that the shift of event horizon depending on the potential of the observation point, and the mass of the observable universe was estimated at 2.49 × 1053 kg. Furthermore, the following interpretations were obtained from this discussion. The redshift of distant stars is gravitational redshift, not due to Doppler shift. And inflation of the universe means that the Schwarzschild radius is expanding, not necessarily that the stars are moving away from each other.
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure
There are no conflicts of interest to disclose regarding this manuscript.Downloads *Displays the aggregated results up to the previous day.
References
The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration et al., The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 875:L1 (2019), https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7
NASA, https://webb.nasa.gov/
R. A. Alpher, H. Bethe and G. Gamow, Physical Review, 73, 803-804 (1948), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.73.803
Nikodem J. Popławski, General Relativity and Gravitation, 53, 18 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-021-02790-7
須藤靖（2022）、宇宙は数式でできている、朝日新書849、朝日新聞出版、ISBN978-4-02-295160-1
Paul Davies (2007), The Goldilocks Enigma, First Mariner Books, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, ISBN 978-0618592265
A. Einstein, Annalen der Physik, 322, 10, 891–921 (1905), https://doi.org/10.1002%2Fandp.19053221004
E. Hubble, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 15, 3, 168-173 (1929), https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.15.3.168
無理関数の原始関数の一覧 - Wikipedia
岡村定矩 監訳（2003）、オックスフォード天文学辞典、朝倉書店、ISBN 4-254-15017-2
F. Hoyle, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 108, 5, 372–382 (1948), https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/108.5.372
C. Jönsson, Zeitschrift für Physik, 161, 454–474 (1961), https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01342460
Downloads
Posted
Submitted: 2022-05-05 20:20:45 UTC
Published: 2022-05-17 08:11:13 UTC — Updated on 2024-02-05 08:25:57 UTC
Versions
Reason(s) for revision
Because there was an error in formula 25 in manuscript version 3, the calculation formula and its interpretation were revised in this manuscript. In addition, the discussion and title have been updated and organized.License
Copyright (c) 2022
Masato Yamawaki
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
