Proof that Collatz conjecture is positive using the classiification in binary, a multiple of 3 and the general term of progression of differences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51094/jxiv.69Keywords:
Collatz Conjecture, 3x 1, progression of differences, expected value, digit, binary, classification, a multiple of 3Abstract
This paper presents a new proof of Collatz conjecture using the classification in binary, a multiple of 3 and the general term of progression of differences.
When Collatz process is done, we focus on numbers. Many sequences of numbers are generated. It is the progression of differences. The general term of progression of differences are computed. Then, the classification in binary, the proof of contradiction, a multiple of 3 and the general term of progression of differences are used to prove that all positive odd other than one do not enter an infinite loop (e.g. 1→3→4→1) by one, two or more cycles of Collatz process.
Using the classification in binary, we focus on the number of digits. We calculate the expected values of digit (multiply 3 and add 1) (A) and (divide by 2) (B).
Comparing the expected values of A and B, we find that there are unequal (B is greater than or equal to A).
Thus, Collatz process does not diverge to positive infinity and eventually reaches one digit in binary. Since one digit obtained from Collatz process in binary is equal to 1 in decimal, number of times that the Collatz process reaches 1 is limited. Therefore, we clarify that Collatz conjecture is positive.
Downloads *Displays the aggregated results up to the previous day.
References
J. C. Lagrarias, The 3x + 1 Problem and its generalizations, American Math- ematical Monthly, Volume 92, 1985.
Terence. C. Tao, Almost all orbits of the Collatz map attain almost bounded values, arXiv:1909.03562(math).
http://www.kurims, kyoto-u. ac. jp/ motizuki, INTER-UNIVERSAL TE- ICHMU ̈LLER THEORY I, Fig. 12.1.
Downloads
Posted
Submitted: 2022-05-14 04:27:14 UTC
Published: 2022-06-13 02:59:54 UTC — Updated on 2022-08-31 11:43:26 UTC
Versions
- 2023-08-29 07:18:35 UTC (4)
- 2023-03-07 08:47:57 UTC (3)
- 2022-08-31 11:43:26 UTC (2)
- 2022-06-13 02:59:54 UTC (1)
Reason(s) for revision
It is insufficient explained that no number can enter an infinite loop except one, even if the Collatz process is repeated two or more times. So, explanation of proof is added. In addition, lexical errors are found and corrected as well.License
Copyright (c) 2022
Makoto Matsumoto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.