産学の「境界」をめぐる考察
スタートアップ・エコシステムにおける起業支援人材の役割定義に向けた概念整理
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51094/jxiv.1353キーワード:
バウンダリー・スパナー、 産学連携、 組織の境界、 研究の事業化抄録
本研究は、日本のスタートアップ・エコシステムにおける主要な担い手である「起業支援人材」の役割を、産学間の「境界」に焦点を当てて定義することを目的とする。既存文献のナラティブレビューを通じて、産学連携、特に大学の研究の事業化における課題を探求する。分析の結果、アカデミアと産業界の異なる動機が産学の境界を生み出しているという構図が示された。大学は研究を優先する一方、産業界は経済的利益に焦点を当てる。これらの相違は、知識に内在する「粘着性 (stickiness)」や「翻訳可能性 (translatability)」と相まって、効果的な連携を阻害している。これらのギャップを埋めるために、「バウンダリー・スパナー (boundary spanner)」の概念が導入される。本研究は、起業支援人材がバウンダリー・スパナーとして機能し、境界の定義、情報の翻訳、連携枠組みの構築、知識流通の促進といった役割を果たすことを示す。起業支援人材は、産学という異なる組織のアイデンティティと目標から生じる対立を緩和する上で、極めて重要な役割を担っている 。本研究は、提案した枠組みを検証し、産学連携におけるバウンダリー・スパニングの実践的意義を探求するための実証研究の必要性を指摘する。
利益相反に関する開示
本研究について開示すべきCOIはありません。ダウンロード *前日までの集計結果を表示します
引用文献
Aldrich, H., & Herker, D. (1977). Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. Academy of Management Review, 2(2), 217-230. https://doi.org/10.2307/257905
Ankrah, S., & AL-Tabbaa, O. (2015). Universities–industry collaboration: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(3), 387-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2015.02.003
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12(2), 198-213. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.2.198.10116
Cabinet Office. (2025). Dai 2-ki sutatoappu ekoshisutemu kyoten keisei senryaku ni muketa kihonteki kangae kata [Basic concept for the second phase startup ecosystem hub formation strategy]. https://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/openinnovation/ecosystem/2ndconcept/2nd_concept.pdf (in Japanese).
Carlile, P. R. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 555-568. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0094
Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x
Dolmans, S. A. M., Walrave, B., Read, S., & Van Stijn, N. (2022). Knowledge transfer to industry: How academic researchers learn to become boundary spanners during academic engagement. Journal of Technology Transfer, 47(5), 1422-1450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09882-1
Funatsu, S. (2020). Seido rojikku tagenshoka ni oite kagaku to jigyo wo ryoritsu saseru soshiki no taio [Organizational Responses to Coexistence of Science and Business under the Multiplicity of Institutional Logic]. Organizational Science, 54(2), 48-64. https://doi.org/10.11207/soshikikagaku.54.2_48 (in Japanese)
Funatsu, S. (2023). Sangaku renkei no soshiki, kojin, shakai (sei) [Organizations, Individuals and Society in University-Industry Collaboration]. Organizational Science, 56(4), 50-66. https://doi.org/10.11207/soshikikagaku.20230712-4 (in Japanese)
Jain, S., George, G., & Maltarich, M. (2009). Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity. Research Policy, 38(6), 922-935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.02.007
Jesiek, B. K., Mazzurco, A., Buswell, N. T., & Thompson, J. D. (2018). Boundary Spanning and Engineering: A Qualitative Systematic Review. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(3), 380-413. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20219
Kamata, T., & Funakoshi, E. (2024). Nyurodai bashiti to wa nani ka [What is neurodiversity?]. AAOS Transactions, 12(4), 30-44. https://doi.org/10.11207/aaostrans.2024-005 (in Japanese)
Ménard, C. (2004). The economics of hybrid organizations. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE) / Zeitschrift Für Die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 160(3), 345-376.
Murakawa, S., & Tanaka, S. (2024). Kigyo ekoshisutemu keisei ni muketa shien jinzai ikusei puroguramu no chosa kenkyu [Survey for Support Staff Development Program Toward Formation of Entrepreneurial Ecosystem]. Journal of Japan Society for Innovation and Purchasing Management, 21(1), 1_69-1_75. https://doi.org/10.11305/jjsip.21.1_69 (in Japanese)
Nagahira, A. (2000). Sangaku renkei ni yoru seika soshutsu no tame no manejimento [Management for creating results through industry-academia collaboration]. Organizational Science, 34(1), 12-21. https://doi.org/10.11207/soshikikagaku.20220715-33 (in Japanese)
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., Krabel, S., Kitson, M., Llerena, P., Lissoni, F., Salter, A., & Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
Perkmann, M., McKelvey, M., & Phillips, N. (2019). Protecting scientists from gordon gekko: How organizations use hybrid spaces to engage with multiple institutional logics. Organization Science, 30(2), 298-318. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1228
Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. (2001). Beyond local search: Boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22(4), 287-306. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.160
Santos, F. M., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2005). Organizational boundaries and theories of organization. Organization Science, 16(5), 491-508. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0152
Singh, J. (2008). Distributed R&D, cross-regional knowledge integration and quality of innovative output. Research Policy, 37(1), 77-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.09.004
Sugiyama, Y., Osanai, A., Kameoka, K., & Funatsu, S. (2023). Ekkyo kyodo no keiei-gaku: Soshiki to kuni no kyokai o koeta jigyo purosesu [Management of cross-border collaboration: Business processes beyond organizational and national boundaries]. Hakutoshobo. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130016405622063757 (in Japanese)
Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 27-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171105
Takada, H. (2020). ”Pasuturu-gata” kenkyusha to daigaku-hatsu bencha no kankei-sei ni kansuru kosatsu [Study on the Relationship between Pasteur-typeResearchers and University Startups]. Kenkū Gijutsu Keikaku [Journal of the Japan Society for Research Policy and Innovation Management], 35(3), 305-315. https://doi.org/10.20801/jsrpim.35.3_305 (in Japanese)
Teigland, R., & Wasko, M. M. (2003). Integrating knowledge through information trading: Examining the relationship between boundary spanning communication and individual performance*. Decision Sciences, 34(2), 261-286. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5915.02341
Tushman, M. L. (1977). Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(4), 587-605. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392402
Tushman, M. L., & Scanlan, T. J. (1981). Boundary spanning individuals: Their role in information transfer and their antecedents. Academy of Management Journal, 24(2), 289-305. https://doi.org/10.2307/255842
Williamson, O. E. (1979). Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. The Journal of Law and Economics, 22(2), 233-261. https://doi.org/10.1086/466942
ダウンロード
公開済
投稿日時: 2025-07-02 17:20:01 UTC
公開日時: 2025-07-04 04:38:57 UTC
ライセンス
Copyright(c)2025
辻村, 千尋

この作品は、Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licenseの下でライセンスされています。