Preprint / Version 1

The current status and potential of neighbourhood associations in an individualized society

a comparison of urban and rural areas

##article.authors##

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51094/jxiv.735

Keywords:

neighbourhood associations, community, social isolation, collaboration, together

Abstract

This paper analyses the role and function of the neighbourhood associations(chonaikai) in today's highly individualised society from a sociological perspective, comparing an urban area (Kanazawa City) and a rural area (Hakui City). Specifically, a survey was conducted on the chonaikai chairpersons in both cities to compare the management of the chonaikai, the awareness of its members and the actual status of community activities. The survey results show that in Kanazawa City, a lack of qualified board members, a delay in the digitalisation of activities and a decline in residents' interest in activities emerged as problems. On the other hand, in Hakui, a high participation rate has been maintained, but the ageing of the board members and the decline in residents' awareness of participation have become problems. In response to these issues, it was suggested that it is necessary to promote the participation of younger people, promote digitisation and strengthen cooperation with the administration. Neighbourhood associations play an important role in strengthening links between local residents and reducing social isolation and loneliness, but new measures are required to ensure sustainable management.

Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

There are no COIs to be disclosed to the first author or co-authors in relation to this study.

Downloads *Displays the aggregated results up to the previous day.

Download data is not yet available.

References

江口尚, 2018, 「働く人たちの参加する個人と組織の活性化手法−職場のソーシャル・キャピタルとジョブ・クラフティング」, 『労働の科学』73(9): 8-12.

金沢市・金沢大学文学部社会学研究室編, 2007, 『金沢市におけるコミュニティの実態と市民意識の分析』金沢大学文学部社会学コース社会調査実習報告書第26号.

小山弘美, 2022, 「町内会・自治会の課題とコロナ禍後の活動―東京都葛飾区新小岩地区の自治会を事例に」, 『関東学院大学人文学会紀要』, 146: 1-29.

眞鍋知子, 2023, 『金沢市町会長アンケート調査報告書』令和4年度金沢大学共同研究実施報告書.

内閣府, 2022, 『令和4年高齢社会白書』(https://www8.cao.go.jp/kourei/whitepaper/w-2022/zenbun/04pdf_index.html).

内閣府, 2024, 『人々のつながりに関する基礎調査(令和5年)調査結果の概要』(https://www.cao.go.jp/kodoku_koritsu/torikumi/zenkokuchousa/r5/pdf/tyosakekka_gaiyo.pdf).

OECD, 2005, Society at a Glance 2005, OECD Social Indicators.

Runciman, David, 2012, “Together: The Rituals, Pleasures and Politics of Co-operation by Richard Sennett – review,” The Guardian, (2024年5月7日取得, https://www.theguardian.com/books/2012/feb/03/together-politics-cooperation-richard-sennett-review)

Sennett, Richard, Together: The Rituals, Pleasures and Politics of Cooperation, Yale University Press.

地域コミュニティに関する研究会, 2022, 『地域コミュニティに関する研究会報告書』総務省(https://www.soumu.go.jp/main_content/000819371.pdf).

玉野和志, 2022, 「自治会・町内会のこれまでとこれから」, 『月刊DIO』, 372: 15-18.

田邊浩, 2007, 「地域コミュニティ組織とその活性化」, 金沢市・金沢大学文学部社会学研究室編『金沢市におけるコミュニティの実態と市民意識の分析』金沢大学文学部社会学コース社会調査実習報告書第26号, 20-30頁.

東北都市社会学研究会編, 1995, 『仙台市における町内会の構成と活動の実態 : 仙台市町内会調査報告書』東北都市社会学研究会.

鳥越晧之, 1994, 『地域自治会の研究 ― 部落会・町内会・自治会の展開過程』ミネルヴァ書房.

辻中豊・ロバート・ペッカネン・山本英弘,2009,『現代日本の自治会・町内会―第1回全国調査にみる自治力・ネットワーク・ガバナンス―』木鐸社.

吉原直樹, 1980, 『地域社会と地域住民組織』八千代出版.

吉原直樹, 2002, 「町内会論― コミュニティ形成論における近代認識」, 『日本都市社会学会年報』20: 45-62.

Posted


Submitted: 2024-05-31 12:17:45 UTC

Published: 2024-06-07 10:17:55 UTC
Section
Sociology