Preprint / Version 1

Interorganizational Cooperation through Psychological Safety

A Case Study on Japanese Regional Rice-Wine (Sake) Industry

##article.authors##

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51094/jxiv.1763

Keywords:

Competition, Cooperation, Psychological Safety, Japanese Sake Brewery Industry

Abstract

Competition is typically conceptualized as a market mechanism shaping firms’ competitiveness and innovation. However, our understanding of competition remains incomplete, particularly regarding a situation where firms opt for cooperation instead of rivalry. This study explores why some firms collaborate with competitors within the same industry and to identify the factors driving this behavior. Aiming to fill gaps in existing management literature, especially in competitive strategy, this paper adopts the theoretical framework of psychological safety. This concept emphasizes protecting members from negative situations to promote enhanced performance. The research context is the Japanese Regional Rice-Wine (Sake) industry, characterized by regional cooperative networks among breweries. Utilizing qualitative research methods, the findings elucidate the underlying mechanisms prompting firms to collaborate with competitors in a competitive market environment.

Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Downloads *Displays the aggregated results up to the previous day.

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baer, M., & Frese, M. (2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(1), 45-68. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.179

Barnett, W. P., & Hansen, M. T. (1996). The red queen in organizational evolution. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S1), 139-157.

https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171010

Barnett, W. P., & McKendrick, D. G. (2004). Why are some organizations more competitive than others? Evidence from a changing global market. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(4), 535-571. https://doi.org/10.2307/4131490

Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R., & Tsai, W. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 795-817. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159624

Burke, C. S., Sims, D. E., Lazzara, E. H., & Salas, E. (2007). Trust in leadership: A multi‐level review and integration. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 606–632.

Carmeli, A., & Gittell, J. H. (2009). High‐quality relationships, psychological safety, and learning from failures in work organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(6), 709-729. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.565

Deng, H., Leung, K., Lam, C. K., & Huang, X. (2019). Slacking Off in Comfort: A Dual-Pathway Model for Psychological Safety Climate. Journal of Management, 45(3)

Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.

https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999

Edmondson, A.,C. (2022). Osore no nai sosiki［The Fearless Organization］. (T. Nozu, Trans.). Eichi syuppan. (Original work published 2018)

Edmondson, A. C., & Bransby, D. P. (2023). Psychological safety comes of age: Observed themes in an established literature. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 55-78. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-055217

Edmondson, A. C., Kramer, R. M., & Cook, K. S. (2004). Psychological safety, trust, and learning in organizations: A group-level lens. In R. Kramer & K. Cook (Eds.), Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches, (pp. 239-272). Russell Sage Foundation.

Fulmer, C. A., & Gelfand, M. J. (2012). At what level (and in whom) we trust: Trust across multiple organizational levels. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1167-1230.

Greve, H., Rowley, T., & Shipilov, A. (2013). Network advantage: How to unlock value from your alliances and partnerships. John Wiley & Sons.

Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 293-317.https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199804)19:4<293::AID-SMJ982>3.0.CO;2-M

Gulati, R., & Singh, H. (1998). The architecture of cooperation: Managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Administrative Science Quarterly, 781-814. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393616

Gulati, R., Wohlgezogen, F., & Zhelyazkov, P. (2012). The two facets of collaboration: Cooperation and coordination in strategic alliances. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 531-583.

Kim, S., Lee, H., & Connerton, T. P. (2020). How psychological safety affects team performance: mediating role of efficacy and learning behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1581. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01581

Maurer, I., & Ebers, M. (2006). Dynamics of social capital and their performance implications: Lessons from biotechnology start-ups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(2), 262-292. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.51.2.262

Mukerjee, J., & Metiu, A. (2022). Play and psychological safety: An ethnography of innovative work. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 39(3), 394-418.

https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12598

Niigata Seisyu Gakko Souritsu 30nen Kinenshi Hensyu Iinkai (2014). Tutaeyo! Niigata Seisyu no oishisawo!: Niigata Seisyu Gakko Souritu 30nen Kinenshi［Let’s tell the Tastiness of Niigata Seisyu: the booklet of the 30th anniversary of the establishment of Niigata Sake Brewery School］. Sanjyo Syuppan (in Japanese).

Porter, M. E. (1991). Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 12(S2), 95-117. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250121008

Sakai, M., & Kimura, Y. (2024). Formation of Interdependence among Individuals in the Initial Phase of Intercompany Collaboration: The Role of Leaders and Members of AI Consortiums in Japan, Administrative Science, 14: 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14060124

Stuart, T. E., Hoang, H., & Hybels, R. C. (1999). Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 315-349. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666998

Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 674-698. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2096399

Downloads

Posted


Submitted: 2025-10-18 07:07:57 UTC

Published: 2025-10-24 01:43:42 UTC
Section
Economics, Business & Management

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Byeongsik KIM
Youngjae KOH

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.