Preprint / Version 2

Chicken Eggs Are a Practical and Common Exome-Matched Diet for Multicellular Eukaryotic Organisms

##article.authors##

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51094/jxiv.1056

Keywords:

Exome-matched diet, Chicken eggs, Amino acid composition, Food composition, Nutrition

Abstract

A 2017 study reported that a diet reflecting the average exomic amino acid composition of a fruit fly—referred to as its “exome-matched diet”—maximized both its lifespan and reproductive output. Building on this insight, a species-specific exome-matched diet was proposed as a candidate for an organism’s optimal amino acid composition.

In this analysis, I used publicly available Reference Proteomes data for 81 different species to calculate each species’ exome-matched diet amino acid composition. I then compared these compositions to approximately 2,000 food items listed in the official Japanese Standard Tables of Food Composition to determine which foods best matched each species’ exome profile. While there was substantial variability among most prokaryotic and certain unicellular eukaryotic organisms, my findings revealed that, with a few exceptions, whole chicken eggs or egg-based products most closely approximated the calculated exome-matched amino acid composition for a broad range of eukaryotic species, especially multicellular organisms. Consequently, for these organisms, whole chicken eggs appear to serve as a practical exome-matched diet.

Although the exome-matched diet does not automatically define an absolutely optimal amino acid composition for nutrition, the finding that the exome-matched diets of multicellular eukaryotes are essentially represented by chicken eggs aligns well with established nutritional principles. This consistency, paradoxically, further suggests the validity of the exome-matched diet concept.

Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

The author declare no conflicts of interest associated with this manuscript.

Downloads *Displays the aggregated results up to the previous day.

Download data is not yet available.

References

Piper, M. D. W., Soultoukis, G. A., Blanc, E., Mesaros, A., Herbert, S. L., Juricic, P., He, X., Atanassov, I., Salmonowicz, H., Yang, M., Simpson, S. J., Ribeiro, C., & Partridge, L. (2017). Matching dietary amino acid balance to the in silico-translated exome optimizes growth and reproduction without cost to lifespan. Cell Metabolism, 25(5), 1206–1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2017.04.020

EMBL-EBI. (2024). Reference Proteomes (Release 2024_02) [Database]. Retrieved January 7, 2025, from https://www.ebi.ac.uk/reference_proteomes/

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [MEXT]. (2020). 日本食品標準成分表2020版(八訂) アミノ酸成分表編 第2章第1表 [Standard tables of food composition in Japan 2020 (Eighth revised edition), amino acid composition table, Chapter 2, Table 1]. Retrieved January 15, 2025, from https://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/syokuhinseibun/index.htm

Mulder, G. J. (1838). Sur la composition de quelques substances animales. Bulletin des Sciences Physiques et Naturelles en Néerlande: 104. https://archive.org/details/bulletindesscien00leyd/page/104/mode/2up

McCoy, R. H., Meyer, C. E., & Rose, W. C. (1935). FEEDING EXPERIMENTS WITH MIXTURES OF HIGHLY PURIFIED AMINO ACIDS. Journal of Biological Chemistry (Vol. 112, Issue 1, pp. 283–302). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)74986-7

ROSE W. C. (1957). The amino acid requirements of adult man. Nutrition abstracts and reviews, 27(3), 631–647. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18146542

Esumi, G. (2023). The distributions of amino acid compositions of proteins in an organism’s proteome uniformly approximate binomial distributions. Jxiv. https://doi.org/10.51094/jxiv.408

Esumi, G. (2025). Construction of a Phylogenetic Tree Based on the Average Amino Acid Composition of Exomes. Jxiv. https://doi.org/10.51094/jxiv.1044

Esumi, G. (2023). The Total Body Amino Acid Composition of an Animal Could Be Explained by a Mixture of the Average Composition of Its Proteome as an Intracellular Composition Estimate and the Type I Collagen Composition as an Extracellular Composition Estimate. Jxiv. https://doi.org/10.51094/jxiv.424

Marmorshtein, S. I., Trahktenberg, A. K., & Bidiak, I. V. (1965). Protein requirements: Reports of a joint FAO-WHO expert group. World Health Organization Technical Report Series, (301), 1–71. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14280833/

Downloads

Posted


Submitted: 2025-01-23 08:08:19 UTC

Published: 2025-01-28 04:29:35 UTC — Updated on 2025-01-30 08:25:15 UTC

Versions

Reason(s) for revision

The primary reason for this revision is the addition of the phrase “ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny” in the Discussion section. To incorporate this idea effectively, I have restructured the Discussion section while maintaining its original content, adjusting the order and refining expressions for better clarity. Additionally, this revision includes the following corrections and improvements: In the Background section, I corrected the term “rats” to “humans” in the explanation of previous studies (this was an unintentional error). In the Figure 4 caption, I changed Asp-Asn and Glu-Gln to Asp-Asn skew and Glu-Gln skew to enhance clarity. I adjusted the formatting (right alignment) to improve overall readability. These are the updates included in this revision.
Section
Biology, Life Sciences & Basic Medicine