Exploring Research Trends in Venture Studies
A Systematic Review through Bibliometric Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51094/jxiv.985Keywords:
venture, start-ups, entrepreneurship, bibliometric analysis, systematic reviewAbstract
This study employs bibliometric analysis to examine the consistency and fragmentation of research trends in venture studies from 2000 to 2024. The findings reveal that four core themes—‘innovation,’ ‘entrepreneurship,’ ‘institutional theory,’ and ‘entrepreneurial orientation’—have been consistently central throughout the period. However, recent years have witnessed an increase in studies addressing emerging phenomena, such as crowdfunding and digital technologies, suggesting a trend toward thematic diversification. By tracing the chronological evolution of the knowledge base in venture research, this study highlights the enduring theoretical foundations and underscores the need for more detailed investigations into emerging trends.
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure
The authors declare no conflicts of interest relevant to this study.Downloads *Displays the aggregated results up to the previous day.
References
Audretsch, D. B., & Thurik, A. R. (2001). What's new about the new economy? Sources of growth in the managed and entrepreneurial economies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(1), 267-315. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.1.267
Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., & Rønde, T. (2021). Waiting for the payday? The market for startups and the timing of entrepreneurial exit. Management Science, 67(3), 1453-1467. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3681
Beckman, C. M., & Burton, M. D. (2008). Founding the future: Path dependence in the evolution of top management teams from founding to IPO. Organization Science, 19(1), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0266
Dacin, M. T., Dacin, P. A., & Tracey, P. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions. Organization science, 22(5), 1203-1213. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0620
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Fisher, G., Kotha, S., & Lahiri, A. (2016). Changing with the times: An integrated view of identity, legitimacy, and new venture life cycles. Academy of Management Review, 41(3), 383-409. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0496
Fisher, G., & Neubert, E. (2023). Evaluating ventures fast and slow: Sensemaking, intuition, and deliberation in entrepreneurial resource provision decisions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 47(4), 1298-1326. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587211042501
Gao, C., & McDonald, R. (2022). Shaping nascent industries: Innovation strategy and regulatory uncertainty in personal genomics. Administrative Science Quarterly, 67(4), 915-967. https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392211060940
Gruber, M., MacMillan, I. C., & Thompson, J. D. (2008). Look before you leap: Market opportunity identification in emerging technology firms. Management Science, 54(9), 1652-1665. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1080.0904
Li, H., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2001). Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1123–1134. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069392
McKelvie, A., Wiklund, J., & Brattström, A. (2018). Externally acquired or internally generated? Knowledge development and perceived environmental dynamism in new venture innovation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(1), 24-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258717747056
McDonald, R., & Gao, C. (2019). Pivoting isn’t enough? Managing strategic reorientation in new ventures. Organization Science, 30(6), 1289-1318. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.1294
Santos, F. M., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2009). Constructing markets and shaping boundaries: Entrepreneurial power in nascent fields. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 643-671. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.43669892
Shepherd, D. A., Souitaris, V., & Gruber, M. (2021). Creating new ventures: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 47(1), 11-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206319900537
Shook, C. L., Priem, R. L., & McGee, J. E. (2003). Venture creation and the enterprising individual: A review and synthesis. Journal of management, 29(3), 379-399. https://doi-org/10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00016-3
Snihur, Y., Thomas, L. D., Garud, R., & Phillips, N. (2022). Entrepreneurial framing: A literature review and future research directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(3), 578-606. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258717716745
Stam, W., & Elfring, T. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance: The moderating role of intra-and extraindustry social capital. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 97-111. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.30721531
Schumpeter, J. A. (2013). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203202050
Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2003). Knowledge‐based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium‐sized businesses. Strategic management journal, 24(13), 1307-1314. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.360
Williams, T. A., & Shepherd, D. A. (2016). Building resilience or providing sustenance: Different paths of emergent ventures in the aftermath of the Haiti earthquake. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 2069-2102. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0682
Wry, T., Lounsbury, M., & Jennings, P. D. (2014). Hybrid vigor: Securing venture capital by spanning categories in nanotechnology. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1309-1333. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0588
York, J. G., Hargrave, T. J., & Pacheco, D. F. (2016). Converging winds: Logic hybridization in the Colorado wind energy field. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 579-610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0657
Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414-431. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.7389932
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational research methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi-org/10.1177/10944281145626
Downloads
Posted
Submitted: 2024-12-03 14:15:38 UTC
Published: 2024-12-06 06:19:09 UTC
License
Copyright (c) 2024
Takayuki Sakai
Tatsuhiko Inoue

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.