Sustainability of Digital Life Form Societies

Hiroshi Yamakawa

doi:10.51094/jxiv.822

##article.authors##

Hiroshi Yamakawa School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6981-0349 https://researchmap.jp/ymkw

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51094/jxiv.822

Keywords:

Digital Life Form, Superintelligence, Thinking Process Development Diagram, Post-Singurality Symbiosis, AI Centric Ethics

Abstract

Even in a society composed of digital life forms (DLFs) with advanced autonomy, there is no guarantee that the risks of extinction from environmental destruction and hostile interactions through powerful technologies can be avoided. Through thought-process diagrams, this study analyzes how peaceful sustainability is challenging for life on Earth, which proliferates exponentially. Furthermore, using these diagrams demonstrates that in a DLF society, various entities launched on demand can operate harmoniously, making peaceful and stable sustainability achievable. Therefore, a properly designed DLF society has the potential to provide a foundation for sustainable support for human society.

Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this study.

Downloads *Displays the aggregated results up to the previous day.

Download data is not yet available.

References

H. Yamakawa, Big Data and Cognitive Computing 3, p. 34 (2019).

H. Yamakawa, JSAI2018, 1F3OS5b01 (2018).

H. Mase, H. Kinukawa, H. Morii, M. Nakao and Y. Hatamura, Transactions of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence = Jinko Chino Gakkai ronbunshi 17, 94(1 January 2002).

M. Tegmark, Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence (Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group, 29 August 2017).

S. J. Dick, International journal of astrobiology 2, 65(January 2003).

R. Kurzweil, The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology (Penguin, 22 Septem- ber 2005).

N. Bostrom, Journal of evolution and technology / WTA 9 (2002).

G. Chaitin, Proving Darwin: Making Biology Mathematical (Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group, 8 May 2012).

N. Bostrom, Minds and Machines 22, 71(May 2012).

M. Shanahan, The Technological Singularity (MIT Press, 7 August 2015).

R. V. Yampolskiy, Workshops at the thirtieth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence (2016).

D. Hendrycks, N. Carlini, J. Schulman and J. Steinhardt(28 September 2021).

S. Russell, Human Compatible: Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Control (Penguin, 8 Octtober 2019).

I. Gabriel, Minds and Machines 30, 411(1 September 2020).

P. Torres, Superintelligence and the future of governance: On prioritizing the control problem at the end of history, in Artificial Intelligence Safety and Security , ed. R. V. Yampolskiy 2018

N. Bostrom, Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies (Oxford University Press, 2014).

P. Christiano, J. Leike, T. B. Brown, M. Martic, S. Legg and D. Amodei, Advances in neural information processing systems abs/1706.03741(12 June 2017).

R. Ngo, L. Chan and S. Mindermann, The alignment problem from a deep learning perspective: A position paper, in The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023.

R. Caillois, Bellone ou la pente de la guerre (numeriquepremium.com, 2012).

I. Kant, Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch (F. Nicolovius, 1795).

A. Einstein and S. Freud, Why War?: “open Letters” Between Einstein & [and] Freud (New Commonwealth, 1934).

F. Braudel, The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II 1996.

M. de Voltaire, Treatise on Toleration (Penguin Publishing Group, 1763).

A. Philipp-Muller, L. E. Wallace, V. Sawicki, K. M. Patton and D. T. Wegener, Frontiers in psychology 11, p. 1919(11 August 2020).

D. H. Sachs, Belief similarity and attitude similarity as determinants of interpersonal attraction (1975).

M. S. Boyce, Population viability analysis (1992).

M. A. Nowak, Science 314, 1560(8 December 2006).

M. D. Beecher, Frontiers in psychology 12, p. 602635(19 March 2021).

M. D. Beecher, Animal communication (2020).

E. A. Hebets, A. B. Barron, C. N. Balakrishnan, M. E. Hauber, P. H. Mason and K. L. Hoke, Proceedings. Biological sciences / The Royal Society 283, p. 20152889(16 March 2016).

W. A. Searcy and S. Nowicki, The Evolution of Animal Communication (Princeton University Press, 1 January 2010).

N. Nagarajan and C. F. Stevens, Current biology: CB 18, R756(9 September 2008).

M. Tinnirello, Offensive realism and the insecure structure of the international system: artificial intelligence and global hegemony, in Artificial Intelligence Safety and Security , (Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2018) pp. 339–356.

E. R. Pianka, The American naturalist 104, 592(November 1970).

E. Cuppen, Policy sciences 45, 23(1 March 2012).

A. Torren˜o, E. Onaindia, A. Komenda and M. Sˇtolba, ACM Comput. Surv. 50, 1(22 November 2017).

T. C. Earle and G. Cvetkovich, Social Trust: Toward a Cosmopolitan Society (Greenwood Publishing Group, 1995).

H. Yamakawa, Y. Matuo, Y. Life revolution scenario: Cedes hegemony to a digital life form society to make life eternal. Jxiv 313 (7 March 2023)

Sustainability of Digital Life Form Societies

##article.authors##

DOI:

Keywords:

Abstract

Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Downloads *Displays the aggregated results up to the previous day.

References

Downloads

Posted

License

Language