Spatiotemporal Distribution of b Value Estimated from Seismic Activity in the Northern Part of Tokushima Prefecture
A Report as of April 2024 in Tokushima City and Surrounding Municipalities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51094/jxiv.713Keywords:
b value, Spatiotemporal distribution, Seismic activity, Kamiura-Nishitsukinomiya fault, Northern part of Tokushima Prefecture, Tokushima CityAbstract
In recent studies, several cases have been reported in which the b value decreased in the vicinity of the mainshock location before a major earthquake. Therefore, the b value, which represents the characteristics of seismic activity in each region, is attracting attention because it may provide helpful information for identifying locations where large earthquakes are likely to occur in the future. The authors have observed the spatial distribution of b values in shallow inland areas of Japan and have continued investigating areas with low b values. This study focused on the northern part of Tokushima Prefecture and observed the spatial distribution of the latest b values from seismic activity up to April 1, 2024. As a result, a low b value area was observed at a depth of around 10 km in Tokushima City and its surrounding cities. The results of the ΔAIC test showed no significant temporal change in the b value in this region, but the most recent b value was as low as 0.63. Depending on the magnitude of future earthquakes, it is possible that a significant decrease in the b value could be observed. Therefore, it is necessary to continue to monitor future seismic activity closely.
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure
There are no conflicts of interest regarding this paper.Downloads *Displays the aggregated results up to the previous day.
References
Gulia L, Wiemer S (2019) Real-time discrimination of earthquake foreshocks and aftershocks. Nature 574:193-199. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1606-4
Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1944) Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 34(4):185-188. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0340040185
Marzocchi W, Sandri L (2003) A review and new insights on the estimation of the b-value and its uncertainty. Annals of Geophysics 46(6):1271-1282. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-3472
Nanjo KZ, Hirata N, Obara K, Kasahara K (2012) Decade-scale decrease in b value prior to the M9-class 2011 Tohoku and 2004 Sumatra quakes. Geophysical Research Letters 39(20):L20304. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052997
Nanjo KZ, Izutsu J, Orihara Y, Furuse N, Togo S, Nitta H, Okada T, Tanaka R, Kamogawa M, Nagao T (2016) Seismicity prior to the 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes. Earth Planets Space 68:187. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-016-0558-2
Nanjo KZ (2020) Were changes in stress state responsible for the 2019 Ridgecrest, California, earthquakes?. Nature Communications 11:3082. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16867-5
Shi Y, Bolt BA (1982) The standard error of the magnitude-frequency b value. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 72(5):1677-1687. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0720051677
Shimbaru T, Yoshida A (2021) The b value in the seismic activity around foci of large crustal earthquakes before and after their occurrence. Zisin (Journal of the Seismological Society of Japan. 2nd ser.) 74:77-86. https://doi.org/10.4294/zisin.2020-5
Shimbaru T (2023) Recent spatial distribution of b value around the northwestern part of the Kego fault. Zisin (Journal of the Seismological Society of Japan. 2nd ser.) 76:1-6. https://doi.org/10.4294/zisin.2022-9
The Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion (2017a) Long-term Evaluation of the Median Tectonic Line active fault zone (Kongosanchitoen-Yufuin) (Version 2). https://www.jishin.go.jp/main/chousa/katsudansou_pdf/20171219_mtl.pdf. Accessed 11 Apr 2024
The Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion (2017b) Long-term Evaluation of the Kamiura-Nishitsukinomiya fault. https://www.jishin.go.jp/main/chousa/17dec_chi_shikoku/shikoku_04_kamiura-nishitsukinomiya.pdf. Accessed 11 Apr 2024
Utsu T (1965) Method for determining the value of b in a formula log n=a-bM showing the magnitude-frequency relation for earthquakes. Geophysical bulletin of the Hokkaido University 13:99-103. https://doi.org/10.14943/gbhu.13.99
Utsu T (1999) Representation and analysis of the earthquake size distribution: A historical review and some new approaches, Pure and Applied Geophysics 155:509-535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s000240050276
Utsu T (2001) Distribution of magnitude of earthquakes. Utsu T (ed) Seismology, 3rd ed. KYORITSU SHUPPAN CO., LTD., Tokyo
Wessel P, Smith WHF (1998) New, improved version of generic mapping tools released. EOS Trans. AGU 79(47):579. https://doi.org/10.1029/98EO00426
Wiemer S, Wyss M (2000) Minimum magnitude of completeness in earthquake catalogs: Examples from Alaska, the Western United States, and Japan. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 90(4):859-869. https://doi.org/10.1785/0119990114
Downloads
Posted
Submitted: 2024-05-14 01:52:17 UTC
Published: 2024-05-14 07:53:19 UTC
License
Copyright (c) 2024
Toshiki SHIMBARU
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.