Preprint / Version 1

More requirements for whole genome sequencing analysis: size and chromatin conformation of nuclear DNA

##article.authors##

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51094/jxiv.253

Keywords:

genome, genome size, chromatin, Hi-C, C-value

Abstract

Advancing DNA sequencing technologies have enabled the acquisition of whole genome sequences of diverse species including targets of aquaculture and conservation, which assists more evidence-based understanding of population structure as well as the molecular basis of biological phenomena characterizing individual species. After the complete sequencing of the human genome was finally achieved, the ‘telomere-to-telomere (T2T)’ grade of whole genome assembly, namely devoid of any undetermined regions, is around the corner for other species. Although DNA sequencing per se is fulfilled with the use of extracted DNA molecules literally, the completion of whole genome assembly requires higher-order evidence of intra-chromosomal linkages of DNA sequences that can be captured from chromatin conformation in the nucleus. Moreover, its product should be validated with the expected size of the genome that is measured independently of DNA sequencing. This article outlines the non-trivial nature of these ‘non-sequencing’ techniques and their importance in modern whole genome assembly and summarizes the authors’ original effort to optimize the use of the techniques.

Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

The authors have no conflict of interest to report.

Downloads *Displays the aggregated results up to the previous day.

Download data is not yet available.

References

Method of the Year 2022: long-read sequencing. (2023) Nature Methods, 20: 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-022-01759-x

Ichikawa, K., S. Tomioka, Y. Suzuki, et al. (12 co-authors) (2017) Centromere evolution and CpG methylation during vertebrate speciation. Nature Communications, 8: 1833.

Nurk, S., S. Koren, A. Rhie, et al. (99 co-authors). (2022) The complete sequence of a human genome. Science, 376: 44-53.

Whibley, A., J.L. Kelley, S.R. Narum (2021) The changing face of genome assemblies: Guidance on achieving high-quality reference genomes. Molecular Ecology Resources, 21: 641–652.

山口 和晃, 工樂 樹洋. (2020)ゲノム情報に支えられたより堅固な生命科学へ:軟骨魚のオプシンを題材として. 比較生理生化学, 37:170-179.

Cheng, H., G.T. Concepcion, X. Feng, et al. (5 co-authors) (2021) Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nature Methods, 18: 170-175.

石川冬木、中山潤一 訳.(2018)「ゲノム 第4版」メディカルインターナショナル, 東京, pp576.

門田満隆、宇野好宣、工樂樹洋 (2019)脊椎動物のゲノムサイズ(核ゲノムDNA量)の推定. シスメックスユーザーリポート,https://shorturl.at/oBJT1

Michaelson, M. J., H.J. Price, J.R. Ellison, J.S. Johnston (1991) Comparison of plant DNA contents determined by Feulgen microspectrophotometry and laser flow cytometry. American Journal of Botany, 78: 183-188.

Hardie, D.C., T.R. Gregory, P.D. Hebert. (2002) From pixels to picograms: a beginners' guide to genome quantification by Feulgen image analysis densitometry. Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry, 50: 735-49.

Pellicer, J., I.J. Leitch (2020) The Plant DNA C-values database (release 7.1): an updated online repository of plant genome size data for comparative studies. New Phytology, 226: 301-305.

Nishimura, O., J. Rozewicki, K. Yamaguchi, et al. (40 co-authors) (2022) Squalomix: shark and ray genome analysis consortium and its data sharing platform. F1000Research, 11:1077.

Wilhelm, J., A. Pingoud, M. Hahn (2003) Real-time PCR-based method for the estimation of genome sizes. Nucleic Acids Research, 31: e56-e56.

Gregory, T. R., P. Nathwani, T.R. Bonnett, D.P. Huber (2013) Sizing up arthropod genomes: an evaluation of the impact of environmental variation on genome size estimates by flow cytometry and the use of qPCR as a method of estimation. Genome, 56: 505-510.

Manni, M., M.R. Berkeley, M. Seppey, et al. (5 co-authors) (2021) BUSCO Update: novel and streamlined workflows along with broader and deeper phylogenetic coverage for scoring of eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and viral genomes. Mol Biol Evol, 38: 4647-4654.

原雄一郎 (2016) どのアセンブリを使うか?: 分子系統学的観点に基づくアセンブリの評価. 日本進化学会ニュース , 17: 23-29.

Arai, R. (2011) Fish Karyotypes. Berlin, Springer.

Lieberman-Aiden, E., N.L. van Berkum, L. Williams, et al. (18 co-authors) (2009) Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome Science, 326: 289–93.

Uno, Y., R. Nozu, I. Kiyatake, et al. (8 co-authors) (2020) Cell culture-based karyotyping of orectolobiform sharks for chromosome-scale genome analysis. Communications Biology, 3: 652.

Burton, J., A. Adey, R. Patwardhan. et al. (6 co-authors) (2013) Chromosome-scale scaffolding of de novo genome assemblies based on chromatin interactions. Nature Biotechnology, 31: 1119–1125.

Kaplan, N., J. Dekker (2013) High-throughput genome scaffolding from in vivo DNA interaction frequency. Nature Biotechnology, 31: 1143-7.

Dudchenko, O., S.S. Batra, A.D. Omer, et al. (11 co-authors) (2017) De novo assembly of the Aedes aegypti genome using Hi-C yields chromosome-length scaffolds. Science, 356: 92-95.

Kadota, M., O. Nishimura, H. Miura, et al. (6 co-authors) (2020) Multifaceted Hi-C benchmarking: what makes a difference in chromosome-scale genome scaffolding? Gigascience, 9: giz158.

Jayakumar, V., O. Nishimura, M. Kadota, et al. (17 co-authors) (2021) Chromosomal-scale de novo genome assemblies of cynomolgus macaque and common marmoset. Scientific Data, 8: 159.

Yamaguchi, K., M. Kadota, O. Nishimura, et al. (6 co-authors) (2021) Technical considerations in Hi-C scaffolding and evaluation of chromosome-scale genome assemblies. Molecular Ecology, 30: 5923-5934.

Kabir, A., R. Ieda, S. Hosoya, et al. (18 co-authors) (2022) Repeated translocation of a supergene underlying rapid sex chromosome turnover in Takifugu pufferfish. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 119: e2121469119.

Yamaguchi, K., Y. Uno, M. Kadota, et al. (9 co-authors) (2022) Elasmobranch genome sequencing reveals evolutionary trends of vertebrate karyotype organization https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.17.512540

Naumova, N., M. Imakaev, G. Fudenberg, et al. (7 co-authors) (2013) Organization of the mitotic chromosome. Science, 342: 948-53.

Ryzhkova, A., A. Taskina, A. Khabarova, et al. (5 co-authors) (2021) Erythrocytes 3D genome organization in vertebrates. Scientific Reports, 11: 4414.

Posted


Submitted: 2023-02-05 02:28:52 UTC

Published: 2023-02-06 10:41:02 UTC
Section
Biology, Life Sciences & Basic Medicine