DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0013838X.2023.2223870
Development of the Subject of BE going to in Grammaticalisation from the 1820s to 2010s in Comparison with BE about to
##article.authors##
-
Michiko Yaguchi
Institute of Arts and Science, Kanazawa University
https://researchmap.jp/read0072170-
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51094/jxiv.243Keywords:
BE going to, BE about to, grammaticalisation, subject, semi-auxiliaryAbstract
This study clarifies the development of the subject of BE going to in relation to its increase in frequency from the 1820s to the 2010s by analysing the Corpus of Historical American English. To effectively demonstrate this, BE about to is also analysed. Whilst the use of BE going to in the passive and there constructions is attested to in the early stage of its grammaticalisation towards becoming a semi-auxiliary, this study suggests that there is a possibility that its use with the what subject was also a sign of initial stage of grammaticalisation. It will be also shown that subjects with simple content appeared earlier than content-rich ones. This study also demonstrates that the frequency order of these subjects in current English corresponds to the chronological order of when the earliest token appeared in the corpus.
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Downloads *Displays the aggregated results up to the previous day.
References
Budts, Sara. “The Grammaticalization of Be Going To in Late Modern English: A Corpus-based Analysis.” <https://www.academia.edu/21024328/The_grammaticalization_of_be_going_to_in_Late_Modern_English_a_corpus_based_analysis> 2013. Accessed on 31 January, 2021.
Budts, Sara and Peter Petré. “Reading the Intentions of Be Going To: On the Subjectification of Future Markers.” Folia Linguistica Historica 37 (2016): 1-32.
Bybee, Joan. “Cognitive Processes in Grammaticalization.” In The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, Volume II, edited by Michael Tomasello.Mahwah: Erlbaum, 2003.
_______ “Mechanisms of Change in Grammaticization: The Role of Frequency.” In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, edited by Brian D. Joseph, and Richard D. Janda. Blackwell: Oxford, 2003.
_______ “From Usage to Grammar: The Mind’s Response to Repetition.” Language 82, no. 4 (2006): 711-33.
_______ Language Change. Oxford: Oxford English Press, 2015.
Bybee, Joan, and William Pagliuca. “The Evolution of Future Meaning.” In Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, edited by Anna Giacalone Ramat, Onofrio Carruba, and Giuliano Bernini. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1987.
Collins, Peter. Modals and Quasi-Modals in English. Amsterdam/New York: Brill Rodop, 2009.
Corpus of Historical American English. <https://www.english-corpora.org/coha/> Accessed from 20 August, 2019 to 30 September, 2022.
Duffley, Patrick J. The English Infinitive. London: Routledge, 1992.
_______ “The Gerund and the To-infinitive as Subjects.” Journal of English Linguistics 31 (2003): 324-52.
Eighteenth Century Collections Online. <https://www.gale.com/jp/c/eighteenth-century-collections-online> Accessed on 25 December, 2022 to 7, January, 2023.
Fischer, Olga. Morphosyntactic Change: Functional and Formal Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
_______ “An Analogical Approach to Grammaticalization.” In Grammaticalization: Current Views and Issues, edited by Ekaterini Stathi, Elke Gehweiler, and Ekkehard König. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2010.
Garrett, Andrew. “The Historical Syntax Problem: Reanalysis and Directionality.” In Grammatical Change: Origins, Nature, Outcomes, edited by Dianne Jonas, John Whitman, and Andrew Garrett. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Heggie, Lorie, A. The Syntax of Copular Structures. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Southern California,1988.
Hilpert, Martin. Germanic Future Constructions: A Usage-based Approach to Language Change. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2008.
Hopper, Paul, and Elizabeth C. Traugott. Grammaticalization, Second edition. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Kirsner, Robert S., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1976. “The Role of Pragmatic Inference in Semantics: A Study of Sensory Verb Complements in English.” Glossa 10 no. 2 (1976): 200-40.
Mair, Christian. “Corpus Linguistics and Grammaticalization Theory: Statistics, Frequencies, and Beyond.” In Corpus Approaches to Grammaticalization in English, edited by Hans Lindquist, and Christian Mair. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2004.
Oxford English Dictionary. <https://www.oed.com/> Accessed in December, 2022.
Palmer, Frank R. Modality and English Modals. Harlow: Longman, 1990.
Pertejo, Paloma Nuñez. 1999. “Be Going To + Infinitive: Origin and Development. Some Relevant Cases from the Helsinki Corpus.” Studia Neophilologica 71 no. 2 (1999): 135-42.
Poole, Joshua. The English Accidence. Early English Books Online, 1646.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. A Comprehensive Grammar of English Language. Harlow: Longman, 1985.
Swan, Michael. Practical English Usage, Fourth Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
Traugott, Elizabeth, C. “On the Persistence of Ambiguous Linguistic Contexts over Time: Implications for Corpus Research on Micro-changes.” In Corpus Linguistics and Variation in English: Theory and Description, edited by Mugnus Huber, and Joybrato Mukherjee. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2012.
Traugott, Elizabeth, C., and Richard Dasher. Regularity in Semantic Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
Traugott, Elizabeth, C., and Graeme, Trousdale. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Wada, Naoaki. “Be Going To and Be About To: Just Because Doc Brown was Going to Take Us Back to the Future Does Not Mean that He was About to Do So.” English Linguistics 17 no. 2 (2000): 386-416.
________ The Grammar of Future Expressions in English. Kaitakusya: Tokyo, 2019.
Watanabe, Takuto. “On the Development of the Immediate Future Use of Be About To in the History of English with Special Reference to Late Modern English.” English Linguistics 28 no. 1 (2011): 56-90.
Yaguchi, Michiko. “The Process of Grammaticalization of Be Bound To as a Semi-auxiliary in American English.” English Corpus Studies 27 (2020): 53-72.
Westney, Paul. Modals and Periphrastics in English. Tubingen: Niemeyer, 1995.
Downloads
Posted
Submitted: 2023-01-11 01:46:34 UTC
Published: 2023-01-18 00:45:36 UTC
License
Copyright (c) 2023
Michiko Yaguchi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
