DOI: 10.1007/s00221-023-06667-w
Implicit motor adaptation driven by intermittent and invariant errors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51094/jxiv.177Keywords:
error-based learning, motor adaptation, implicit learning, sensory prediction errorAbstract
Our movements and movement outcomes are disturbed by environmental changes, leading to errors. During ongoing environmental changes, people should correct their movement using sensory feedback. However, when the changes are momentary, corrections based on sensory feedback are undesirable. Previous studies have suggested that implicit motor adaptation is takes place, despite the realization that the presented visual feedback should be ignored. Although several studies created experimental situations where participants had to continuously ignore the presented visual feedback, in daily lives, people intermittently encounter opportunities to ignore sensory feedback. In this study, by intermittently presenting visual error clamp feedback, always offset from a target by 16° counterclockwise, regardless of the actual movement in a reaching experiment, we provided intermittent opportunities to ignore the visual feedback. We found that in the trials conducted immediately after presenting the visual error clamp feedback, reaching movements shifted in the direction opposite to the feedback; a hallmark of implicit motor adaptation. Moreover, the magnitude of the shift was significantly correlated with the speed of motor adaptation to gradual changes in the environment. Correcting movement according to continuous environmental changes is essential to maintain a precise movement. Therefore, the results suggest that people, unintentionally, react to momentary environmental changes that should be ignored and the sensitivity to momentary changes is greater in people who adapt quickly to the relevant gradual environmental changes.
Downloads *Displays the aggregated results up to the previous day.
References
Avraham G, Keizman M, Shmuelof L (2020) Environmental consistency modulation of error sensitivity during motor adaptation is explicitly controlled. J Neurophysiol 123:57–69. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00080.2019
Avraham G, Morehead JR, Kim HE, Ivry RB (2021) Reexposure to a sensorimotor perturbation produces opposite effects on explicit and implicit learning processes. PLoS Biol 19:e3001147. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001147
Baddeley RJ, Ingram HA, Miall RC (2003) System Identification Applied to a Visuomotor Task: Near-Optimal Human Performance in a Noisy Changing Task. The Journal of Neuroscience 23:3066–3075. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-07-03066.2003
Cohen J. (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Science (2nd Edition)
He K, Liang Y, Abdollahi F, et al (2016) The Statistical Determinants of the Speed of Motor Learning. PLoS Comput Biol 12:e1005023. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005023
Herzfeld DJ, Vaswani PA, Marko MK, Shadmehr R (2014) A memory of errors in sensorimotor learning. Science 345:1349–1353. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1253138
Hutter SA, Taylor JA (2018) Relative sensitivity of explicit reaiming and implicit motor adaptation. J Neurophysiol 120:2640–2648. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00283.2018
Izawa J, Shadmehr R (2011) Learning from Sensory and Reward Prediction Errors during Motor Adaptation. PLoS Comput Biol 7:e1002012. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002012
Kasuga S, Hirashima M, Nozaki D (2013) Simultaneous Processing of Information on Multiple Errors in Visuomotor Learning. PLoS One 8:e72741. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072741
Kim HE, Avraham G, Ivry RB (2021) The Psychology of Reaching: Action Selection, Movement Implementation, and Sensorimotor Learning. Annu Rev Psychol 72:61–95. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-051053
Kim HE, Morehead JR, Parvin DE, et al (2018) Invariant errors reveal limitations in motor correction rather than constraints on error sensitivity. Commun Biol 1:19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-018-0021-y
Kim HE, Parvin DE, Ivry RB (2019) The influence of task outcome on implicit motor learning. Elife 8:e39882. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39882
Kim OA, Forrence AD, Mcdougle SD (2022) Motor learning without movement. PNAS 119:e2204379119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas
Kleiner M, Brainard DH, Pelli DG, et al (2007) What’s new in Psychtoolbox-3? Perception 36:1–16
Krakauer JW, Hadjiosif AM, Xu J, et al (2019) Motor Learning. Compr Physiol 9:613–663. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c170043
Lee K, Oh Y, Izawa J, Schweighofer N (2018) Sensory prediction errors, not performance errors, update memories in visuomotor adaptation. Sci Rep 8:16483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34598-y
Mazzoni P (2006) An Implicit Plan Overrides an Explicit Strategy during Visuomotor Adaptation. Journal of Neuroscience 26:3642–3645. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5317-05.2006
Morehead JR, Taylor JA, Parvin DE, Ivry RB (2017) Characteristics of Implicit Sensorimotor Adaptation Revealed by Task-irrelevant Clamped Feedback. J Cogn Neurosci 29:1061–1074. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01108
Shadmehr R, Smith MA, Krakauer JW (2010) Error Correction, Sensory Prediction, and Adaptation in Motor Control. Annu Rev Neurosci 33:89–108. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-153135
Stark-Inbar A, Raza M, Taylor JA, Ivry RB (2017) Individual differences in implicit motor learning: task specificity in sensorimotor adaptation and sequence learning. J Neurophysiol 117:412–428. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01141.2015
Taylor JA, Ivry RB (2011) Flexible Cognitive Strategies during Motor Learning. PLoS Comput Biol 7:e1001096. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001096
Taylor JA, Ivry RB (2013) Context-dependent generalization. Front Hum Neurosci 7:171. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00171
Tsay JS, Avraham G, Kim HE, et al (2021a) The effect of visual uncertainty on implicit motor adaptation. J Neurophysiol 125:12–22. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00493.2020
Tsay JS, Haith AM, Ivry RB, Kim HE (2022) Interactions between sensory prediction error and task error during implicit motor learning. PLoS Comput Biol 18:e1010005. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010005
Tsay JS, Kim HE, Parvin DE, et al (2021b) Individual differences in proprioception predict the extent of implicit sensorimotor adaptation. J Neurophysiol 125:1307–1321. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00585.2020
Tsay JS, Parvin DE, Ivry RB (2020) Continuous reports of sensed hand position during sensorimotor adaptation. J Neurophysiol 124:1122–1130. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00242.2020
Wei K, Körding K (2009) Relevance of Error: What Drives Motor Adaptation? J Neurophysiol 101:655–664. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.90545.2008
Downloads
Posted
Submitted: 2022-10-01 02:26:12 UTC
Published: 2022-10-04 10:26:39 UTC
License
Copyright (c) 2022
Naoyoshi Matsuda
Masaki Abe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.