Preprint / Version 1

Creative Problem Solving Based on Subjective Experience

Integrating Senses and Meaning through Ritual Design

##article.authors##

  • Atsumu Motoshima Graduate School of Creative Thinking for Social Innovation, Musashino Art University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51094/jxiv.1338

Keywords:

subjective experience, creative problem-solving, Ritual Design, sensory integration, organizational culture

Abstract

This study investigates the role of subjective experience in addressing complex challenges creatively within organizational settings, focusing on how personal, informal information can contribute to such efforts. Drawing on the concept of Ritual Design, the research explores how rituals designed to integrate sensory and emotional aspects can foster creative thinking and facilitate the sharing and transformation of personal experiences into collective insights. Through the implementation of two distinct rituals—Informal KARUTA and Sensory Garden—this research highlights how subjective experience, when shared in a structured environment, can lead to the integration of diverse perspectives and the development of creative solutions to complex problems. The study also discusses the implications of using Ritual Design as a method for embedding subjective experiences into organizational culture, providing a sustainable framework for fostering creativity. The findings suggest that subjective experience not only supports individual creativity but also enhances collaborative problem-solving by aligning emotional and cognitive processes in a shared space.

Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Although the Ritual Design practices described in this study have been implemented in a corporate setting, the authors declare no financial or professional conflict of interest related to the company.

Downloads *Displays the aggregated results up to the previous day.

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Westview Press.

Caillois, R. (2001). Man, play and games (M. Barash, Trans.). University of Illinois Press. (Original work published 1958).

Cropley, A. J. (2020). Definitions. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (3rd ed., pp. 315–322). Academic Press.

Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Design Studies, 32(6), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006

Ekvall, G., & Ryhammar, L. (1999). The creative climate: Its determinants and effects at a Swedish university. Creativity Research Journal, 12(4), 303–310.

Gallagher, S. (2001). The practice of mind: Theory, simulation or primary interaction? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(5-7), 83–108.

Hatch, M. J. (1993). The dynamics of organizational culture. Academy of Management Review, 18(4), 657–693.

Hobson, N. M., Schroeder, J., Risen, J. L., Xygalatas, D., & Inzlicht, M. (2017). The psychology of rituals: An integrative review and process-based framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(3), 302–325.

Ozenc, K., & Hagan, M. (2019). Rituals for work: 50 ways to create engagement, shared purpose, and a culture that can adapt to change. Wiley.

Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657–687.

Runco, M. A., & Pritzker, S. R. (1999). Encyclopedia of creativity. Academic Press.

Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership: A dynamic view. Jossey-Bass.

Yin, R. K. (1996). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Posted


Submitted: 2025-06-27 05:57:41 UTC

Published: 2025-07-14 09:51:08 UTC
Section
Economics, Business & Management