Preprint / Version 1

Analysis of Railway Innovation from the Perspective of Institutional Logic

A study on the evolution from Automatic Train Protection to Automatic Train Operation

##article.authors##

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51094/jxiv.1318

Keywords:

institutional logic, innovation management, Automatic Train Operation, Automatic Train Protection

Abstract

This study analyzes the development of Automatic Train Operation (ATO) based on the Automatic Train Protection (ATP) system in the railway industry from the perspective of institutional logic multiplicity. Specifically, it examines how Kyushu Railway Company (JR Kyushu) became the first in the world to introduce GOA2.5 automatic operation, using the framework of new institutional organization theory. The railway industry operates at the intersection of multiple institutional logics, including business logic that prioritizes economic efficiency, safety logic that emphasizes accident prevention, and regulatory logic that ensures legal compliance. This study highlights how JR Kyushu leveraged ATP-based systems to balance safety and cost-effectiveness while promoting regulatory changes to facilitate automatic operation. The analysis reveals that shifts in institutional logic can drive technological innovation, ultimately influencing macro-level institutional environments. This study contributes to understanding innovation processes in the railway industry through the lens of institutional logic and offers implications for other regulated industries.

Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

I have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Downloads *Displays the aggregated results up to the previous day.

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aoyagi, T., & Mizoguchi, S. (2024). JR Kyushu niokeru zido-unten-syaryo donyu nitsuite [Introduction of automated vehicles by JR Kyushu]. JR gazette, 82 (9), 30-35 (in Japanese).

Arai, H., Manabe, K., & Sato, K. (2007). Development of Basic System on ATS-X with Continuous Surveillance Pattern. Quarterly Report of RTRI, 48 (2), 89-93. https://doi.org/10.2219/rtriqr.48.89

Besharov, M. L., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Multiple Institutional Logics in Organizations: Explaining Their Varied Nature and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 39 (3), 364-381. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0431

DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The Iron Caged Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48 (2), 147-160.

Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practice and institutional contradictions In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp.232-263). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Funatsu, S. (2019). Seido logic tagenseika niokeru soshiki no innovation management: bunken tyosa nimotozuku riron kenkyu [Organizational Innovation Management under Institutional Logic Multiplicity: Theoretical Study based on the Literature Review]. Akamon Management Review, 18 (4), 117-146 (In Japanese). https://doi.org/10.14955/amr.0180928a

Funatsu, S. (2020). Seido logic tagenseika nioite kagaku to jigyo wo ryoritsu saseru soshiki no taio -sangaku renkei project wo daizai toshita zirei kenkyu- [Organizational Responses to Coexistence of Science and Business under the Multiplicity of Institutional Logic: The Case Study of an Academic‑Industrial Partnership]. Organizational Science, 54 (2), 48-61 (In Japanese). https://doi.org/10.11207/soshikikagaku.54.2_48

Hiraguri. S. (2017). Ressya seigyo system no doko to syorai [Trends and future of train control systems]. RRR, 74 (1), 4-7 (In Japanese).

Inoue, Y. (2011). Seidoka sareta shinseidoha-soshikiron [Institutionalized New Institutionalism in Organizational Theories]. Journal of Information and Management, 31 (3), 81-93. https://doi.org/10.20627/jsim.31.3_81

Japan Railway Electrical Engineering Association [JREEA]. (2024). Gijyutsu-kijyun-syorei no tsutatsu no kaisei ni tsuite [News about Technical Standards] (In Japanese). Retrieved 2025/1/26 from https://www.rail-e.or.jp/news/%E3%80%90%E4%BC%9A%E5%93%A1%E5%90%91%E3%81%91%E3%80%91%E6%8A%80%E8%A1%93%E5%9F%BA%E6%BA%96%E7%9C%81%E4%BB%A4%E3%81%AE%E9%80%9A%E9%81%94%E3%81%AE%E6%94%B9%E6%AD%A3%E3%81%AB%E3%81%A4%E3%81%84%E3%81%A6

Koga, T. (2024). Hito ni yasashii kidokotsu-zidoka-gijyutsu [People-friendly automated rail transit technology]. Dai 37 kai tetsudou-souken kouenkai youshi [37th RTRI Lecture], 1-6 (in Japanese).

Kyushu Railway Company [JR Kyushu]. (2017). Kyushu Railway Company Annual Safety Report (in Japanese). Retrieved 2025/1/31 from https://www.jrkyushu.co.jp/company/esg/safety/pdf/2017_anzen.pdf

Kyushu Railway Company [JR Kyushu]. (2024a). 2024 nen 3 gatsu 6 nichi yori futatsuno zido-unten wo kaishi shimasu ! [Two "autonomous driving" will begin on March 16, 2024] (in Japanese). Retrieved 2025/1/26 from https://www.jrkyushu.co.jp/news/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2024/02/22/240222_jidouunten_2.5_2.0.pdf

Kyushu Railway Company [JR Kyushu]. (2024b). JR Kyushu Group Integrated Report (in Japanese). Retrieved 2025/1/31 from https://www.jrkyushu.co.jp/company/ir/library/integrated_report/pdf/2024_ir_J.pdf

Matsushima, N., & Urano, M. (2015). Innovation wo sosyutsu suru seido no hataraki [Institution Works on the Innovational Work] In K. Kuwada, N. Matsushima, & M. Takahashi (Eds.), Seidoteki kigyouka [Institutional Entrepreneurship] (pp.55-84). Nakanishiya Syuppan (In Japanese).

Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83 (2), 340–363.

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Tourism [MLIT]. (n.d). Tetsukido-yuso no anzen nikakawaru jyoho no kohyo nitsuite [Publication of information related to rail transport safety] (in Japanese). Retrieved 2025/1/31 from https://www.mlit.go.jp/tetudo/tetudo_tk8_000001.html

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Tourism [MLIT]. (2022). Tetsudo niokeru zido-unten-gijyutsu-kentokai torimatome [Summary of the Study Group on Automated Driving Technology for Railways] (in Japanese). Retrieved 2025/1/31 from https://www.mlit.go.jp/tetudo/content/001512132.pdf

Miura. Y. (2014). Ressya-unten-toriatsukai to singo-hoan system(27) -JR Kyushu ni okeru ATS-DK no donyu keii- [Train Operation and Signaling Systems (27) The Introduction of ATS-DK in JR Kyushu]. Unten Kyokai Shi, 56 (3), 32-35 (in Japanese).

Mizuma. T. (2017). Tetsudo ni okeru zido-unten no rekishi to kongo [History and Future Trend of Automated Train Operation on Railway]. Journal of The Society of Instrument and Control Engineers, 56 (2), 93-98 (In Japanese). https://doi.org/10.11499/sicejl.56.93

Nakamura, H. (2014). Tetsudo no unkou system ni okeru jyohosyori-gijyutu no doko: Testudo-shingo system no kakushin [Recent Trends of ICT Application to Railway Operation and Signaling Systems : The Innovation of Railway Signaling Systems]. Journal of Information Processing Society of Japan, 55 (3), 268-276 (In Japanese).

Orihara, K., Saito, Y., Nakamura, H., & Oshitate, T. (2017). Tetsudo shingo niokeru anzen-sei shinrai-sei gijyutu no hensen [Traditional of the Safety and Reliability Techniques in Railway Signal], The Journal of Reliability Engineering Association of Japan, 39 (4), 191-199 (In Japanese). https://doi.org/10.11348/reajshinrai.39.4_191

Oshitate. T. (2016). Wagakuni tetsudo no ATS no rekishi to kaizen no keizoku nitsuite [About continuation of history and the improvement of the ATS of our country railway]. Shingou Kougyou Kyoukai Kaihou, 38 (1), 6-13 (In Japanese).

Perkmann, M., McKelvey, M., & Philips, N. (2018). Protecting scientists from Gordon Gekko: How organizations use hybrid spaces to engage with multiple institutional logics. Organization Science, 30 (2), 298-318.

Sato, I. (2003). Seido-koyu no logic kara “portfolio senryaku” he [From institutional logic to "portfolio strategy"]. Organizational Science, 36 (3), 4-17 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.11207/soshikikagaku.20220730-60

Shiga, Y., Kunihiro, M., Matsumoto, W., Tajima, Y., Morita, S., Hosokawa, K., Uchida, T., & Fujita, H. (2021). ATS-DK wo base toshita zido-unten system no kaihatsu [Development of an automated driving system based on ATS-DK]. Railway & electrical engineering, 32 (7), 11-18 (in Japanese).

Takeishi, A., Aoshima, Y., & Karube, M. (2012). Innovation no riyu : shigen-doin no sozoteki seitoka [Reasons for Innovation : Creating Legitimacy for Resource Mobilization]. Yuhikaku (in Japanese).

Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199601936.001.0001

Uenishi, S. (2014). Gorisei no konkyo toshiteno seido: shinseidoha-soshikiron no ishizue tonatta gyoseki nikansuru ichi-kousatsu [Institutionalized Beliefs as the Basis for Rationality : Focusing on the Foundations of New Institutionalism of Organizational Studies]. Kyushu Sangyo University Business Review, 24 (3), 1-14 (In Japanese).

Utterback, J. M., & Abernathy, W. J. (1975). A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega, 3 (6), 639-656. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(75)90068-7

Wakuta, Y. (2015). Shinseidoha soshikiron no igi to kadai [The significance and issues of new institutionalism in organizational theory]. Mitasyogaku kenkyu, 58 (2), 227-237 (in Japanese).

Yamada, M. (2003). Kochikusyugiteki-soshikikan no kanata ni -syakaigakuteki-soshikikenkyu no kakushin- [Beyond the constructivist view of organization: Innovation in sociological organization research]. Organizational Science, 36 (3), 46-58. https://doi.org/10.11207/soshikikagaku.20220730-63

Yasuda, T., & Takahashi, N. (2007). Dokeika mechanism to seitosei [Isomorphism Mechanism and Legitimacy]. Akamon Management Review, 6 (9), 425-432 (In Japanese). https://doi.org/10.14955/

amr.060903

Yasui, S., Iwaki, Y., & Sato, K. (2011). JR, Mintetsu no ATS(4) -JR Kyushu no ATS- [JR and private railway ATS (4) -JR Kyushu ATS-]. Railway & Electrical Engineering, 22, 70-75 (in Japanese).

Posted


Submitted: 2025-06-23 01:59:30 UTC

Published: 2025-06-24 02:14:33 UTC
Section
Economics, Business & Management