プレプリント / バージョン1

カテゴリー再構築と組織美学の表現

八丁味噌の事例分析

##article.authors##

  • Tang, Wai Yeung メルボルン大学大学院マネジメント&マーケティング専攻
  • 加藤, 敬太 埼玉大学大学院人文社会科学研究科 https://researchmap.jp/keitakato01

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51094/jxiv.817

キーワード:

組織美学、 葛藤、 カテゴリー再構築、 商品カテゴリー、 地理的表示保護制度(GI)、 八丁味噌

抄録

本研究の目的は、研究者に新たな視点を提示するべく、カテゴリーを組織美学の表現できる舞台として論じることである。従来の文献では、カテゴリーが組織における市場機能や正当性の確立を果たす、信念主導や倫理主導の役割に焦点を当てていた。本研究では、八丁味噌と地理的表示保護制度(GI)の事例分析から、カテゴリー内の再構築プロセスを通じて競合する組織美学と複数のカテゴリーが共存し得るメカニズムを明らかにする。

利益相反に関する開示

この投稿に対して、全ての著者は利益相反に関する開示はありません

ダウンロード *前日までの集計結果を表示します

ダウンロード実績データは、公開の翌日以降に作成されます。

引用文献

Araujo, L. (2007). Markets, market-making and marketing. Marketing Theory, 7(3), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593107080342

Belk, R. W., Fischer, E., & Kozinets, R. V. (2013). Qualitative consumer & marketing research. SAGE.

Besharov, M. L., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Multiple Institutional Logics in Organizations: Explaining Their Varied Nature and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 364–381. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0431

Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The Use of Triangulation in Qualitative Research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545–547. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547

David, R. J., & Lee, Y. (2022). The short history and long future of research on market categories. Strategic Organization, 20(4), 709–721. https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270221134287

Debenedetti, A., Philippe, D., Chaney, D., & Humphreys, A. (2021). Maintaining legitimacy in contested mature markets through discursive strategies: The case of corporate environmentalism in the French automotive industry. Industrial Marketing Management, 92, 332–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.02.009

Denegri-Knott, J., & Tadajewski, M. (2017). Sanctioning value: The legal system, hyper-power and the legitimation of MP3. Marketing Theory, 17(2), 219–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593116677766

Durand, R., & Paolella, L. (2013). Category Stretching: Reorienting Research on Categories in Strategy, Entrepreneurship, and Organization Theory. Journal of Management Studies, 50(6), 1100–1123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01039.x

Gagliardi, P. (2007). The Collective Repression of `Pathos’ in Organization Studies. Organization, 14(3), 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508407076147

Glynn, M. A., & Navis, C. (2013). Categories, Identities, and Cultural Classification: Moving Beyond a Model of Categorical Constraint. Journal of Management Studies, 50(6), 1124–1137. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12023

Godart, F., Hsu, G., & Negro, G. (2023). Gatekeeping and the Use of Contested Practices in Creative Industries: The Case of Fur in Fashion. Organization Science, 34(2), 637–656. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.1591

Hannan, M. T., Pólos, L., & Carroll, G. R. (2007). Logics of organization theory: Audiences, codes, and ecologies. Princeton university press.

Hatcho Miso Cooperative. (2023). What is Hatcho miso—Hatcho Miso Cooperative. https://www.hatcho.jp/1-1.html

Hsu, G., & Grodal, S. (2015). Category Taken-for-Grantedness as a Strategic Opportunity: The Case of Light Cigarettes, 1964 to 1993. American Sociological Review, 80(1), 28–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122414565391

Hsu, G., & Grodal, S. (2021). The Double-edged Sword of Oppositional Category Positioning: A Study of the U.S. E-cigarette Category, 2007–2017. Administrative Science Quarterly, 66(1), 86–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839220914855

Humphreys, A., & Thompson, C. J. (2014). Branding Disaster: Reestablishing Trust through the Ideological Containment of Systemic Risk Anxieties. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(4), 877–910. https://doi.org/10.1086/677905

Kakukyu. (2023). What is Hatcho miso? Limited Partnership Hatcho Miso / Kakukyu Hatcho Miso Co. https://www.kakukyu.jp/hatchomiso.asp

Kato K. (2021). Soshiki bigaku no seisei to hatten [The emergence and development of organizational aesthetics]. Transactions of the Academic Association for Organizational Science, 10(2), 22-27 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.11207/taaos.10.2_22

Kozinets, R. V. (2015). Netnography: Redefined (2nd edition). Sage.

Krabbe, A. D., & Grodal, S. (2023). The Aesthetic Evolution of Product Categories. Administrative Science Quarterly, 68(3), 734–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392231173677

Lee, B. H., Hiatt, S. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2017). Market Mediators and the Trade-offs of Legitimacy- Seeking Behaviors in a Nascent Category. Organization Science, 28(3), 447–470. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1126

Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. (2024). Chiritekihyōjihō [Geographical Indication System]. https://www.maff.go.jp/j/shokusan/gi_act/outline/index.html.

Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. (2017). No. 49: Hatcho Miso: Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. https://www.maff.go.jp/j/shokusan/gi_act/register/0049/index.html

Morse, J. M., & Richards, L. (2002). Readme first for a user’s guide to qualitative methods. Sage.

Rosa, J. A., Porac, J. F., Runser-Spanjol, J., & Saxon, M. S. (1999). Sociocognitive Dynamics in a Product Market. Journal of Marketing, 63, 64–77. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252102

Scaraboto, D., & Fischer, E. (2013). Frustrated Fatshionistas: An Institutional Theory Perspective on Consumer Quests for Greater Choice in Mainstream Markets. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(6), 1234–1257. https://doi.org/10.1086/668298

Suarez, F. F., Grodal, S., & Gotsopoulos, A. (2015). Perfect timing? Dominant category, dominant design, and the window of opportunity for firm entry. Strategic Management Journal, 36(3), 437–448. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2225

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788

Sujan, M. (1985). Consumer Knowledge: Effects on Evaluation Strategies Mediating Consumer Judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1086/209033

Taylor, S. S., & Hansen, H. (2005). Finding Form: Looking at the Field of Organizational Aesthetics. Journal of Management Studies, 42(6), 1211–1231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 6486.2005.00539.x

ダウンロード

公開済


投稿日時: 2024-07-15 09:37:01 UTC

公開日時: 2024-07-25 01:39:08 UTC
研究分野
経済学・経営学