これは2026-08-06 04:38:32 UTCで公開された古いバージョンです。最新バージョンをお読みください。
プレプリント / バージョン2

Domain-First KL Rigidity of the Higgs Potential: A Positive-Domain Log Barrier and the Prediction κ_λ^vac = −1/3

##article.authors##

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51094/jxiv.3329

キーワード:

radial invariant、 Higgs trilinear self-coupling、 gluon fusion、 triangle–box interference、 minimal closure、 closure stability、 matched truncation、 Hessian metric、 Bregman divergence、 Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT)

抄録

Higgs vacuum phenomenology is usually organized by vacuum-local polynomial ansätze—the renormalizable Standard Model form and polynomial effective-field-theory deformations—and then tacitly interpreted as if they characterized the global vacuum sector. Such truncations are locally valid, but they do not by themselves determine the completion status or infinite-distance character of the gauge-invariant positive radial boundary ρ ≡ 2H†H → 0⁺. We formulate a test-facing, domain-first shape hypothesis on the interior ratio domain ψ ≡ ρ/v² > 0, with the electroweak vacuum anchored at ψ = 1. Admissible interior shapes are restricted by equilibrium anchoring, strict convexity, and a minimal two-type homogeneous marginal closure. The continuous homogeneous marginal types of degrees 0 and −1 are respectively constant and reciprocal, motivating ∆′(ψ) ∈ span{1, ψ⁻¹}. Within this declared class, the generator is fixed up to scale to ∆(ψ) = a(ψ − 1 − ln ψ), with a > 0. The selected generator induces the Hessian scale metric ds²_∆ = a dψ²/ψ² = a d(ln ψ)², under which ψ → 0⁺ lies at infinite distance from every interior point. The same limit also lies at infinite potential excess and infinite anchored Bregman separation. These consequences follow from the selected generator, not from positivity alone. In unitary gauge, ψ = (1 + h/v)², so the finite additive endpoint h → −v⁺ corresponds to ln ψ → −∞. After fixing the normalization with (m_h, v), the selected shape correlates the near-vacuum derivative tower and yields κ_λ^vac ≡ λ₃/λ₃^SM = −1/3. Comparison with data is performed through κ_λ^vac → κ_λ^tmpl → κ_λ^fit, with a declared finite confounder set and matched truncation. The primary falsification handle is the triangle–box interference pattern in gg → hh, tested through interference-sensitive differential information rather than inclusive rates alone. The proposal therefore constitutes a falsifiable global shape hypothesis for the Higgs vacuum sector.

利益相反に関する開示

The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest.

ダウンロード *前日までの集計結果を表示します

ダウンロード実績データは、公開の翌日以降に作成されます。

引用文献

T. Imaizumi, Optimal Entropic Dimensionality: A Continuous Variational Principle for Geometric Equilibrium, Jxiv preprint, Version 1 (Dec. 2025). doi:10.51094/jxiv.2161.

B. Di Micco, M. Gouzevitch, J. Mazzitelli, C. Vernieri, et al., Higgs Boson Potential at Colliders: Status and Perspectives, Reviews in Physics 5 (2020) 100045. arXiv:1910.00012. doi:10.1016/j.revip.2020.100045.

H. Abouabid, et al., HHH Whitepaper, The European Physical Journal C 84 (2024) 1183. arXiv:2407.03015. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13376-3.

ATLAS Collaboration, Constraints on the Higgs Boson Self-Coupling from Single- and Double-Higgs Production with the ATLAS Detector Using pp Collisions at √s = 13 TeV, Physics Letters B 843 (2023) 137745. arXiv:2211.01216. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137745.

CMS Collaboration, Constraints on the Higgs Boson Self-Coupling from the Combination of Single and Double Higgs Boson Production in Proton-Proton Collisions at √s = 13 TeV, arXiv preprint (2024). arXiv:2407.13554.

ATLAS Collaboration, CMS Collaboration, Combination of ATLAS and CMS Searches for Higgs Boson Pair Production at √s = 13 TeV, arXiv preprint (2026). arXiv:2602.23991.

I. Brivio, M. Trott, The Standard Model as an Effective Field Theory, Physics Reports 793 (2019) 1–98. arXiv:1706.08945. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.11.002.

H. Bahl, J. Braathen, G. Weiglein, New Constraints on Extended Higgs Sectors from the Trilinear Higgs Coupling, Physical Review Letters 129 (23) (2022) 231802. arXiv:2202.03453. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.231802.

M. Carena, Z. Liu, M. Riembau, Probing the Electroweak Phase Transition via Enhanced Di-Higgs Boson Production, Physical Review D 97 (2018) 095032. arXiv:1801.00794. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.095032.

M. Reichert, A. Eichhorn, H. Gies, J. M. Pawlowski, T. Plehn, M. M. Scherer, Probing Baryogenesis through the Higgs Boson Self-Coupling, Physical Review D 97 (2018) 075008. arXiv:1711.00019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.075008.

N. Hiroshima, M. Kakizaki, S. Ohzawa, Classifying Extended Higgs Models through the Trilinear Higgs Boson Coupling Measurement at Future Colliders, Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics 2026 (2) (2026) 023B03. arXiv:2510.27560. doi:10.1093/ptep/ptag001.

H. Bahl, J. Braathen, M. Gabelmann, G. Weiglein, anyH3: Precise Predictions for the Trilinear Higgs Coupling in the Standard Model and Beyond, The European Physical Journal C 83 (2023) 1156. arXiv:2305.03015. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-12173-8. Erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 504 (2024), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12848-w.

S. Heinemeyer, M. Mühlleitner, K. Radchenko, G. Weiglein, Higgs Pair Production in the 2HDM: Impact of Loop Corrections to the Trilinear Higgs Couplings and Interference Effects on Experimental Limits, The European Physical Journal C 85 (2025) 437. arXiv:2403.14776. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14124-x.

J. El Falaki, Revisiting One-Loop Corrections to the Trilinear Higgs Boson Self-Coupling in the Inert Doublet Model, Physics Letters B 840 (2023) 137879. arXiv:2301.13773. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137879.

S. M. Apenko, Information Theory and Renormalization Group Flows, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 391 (1–2) (2012) 62–77. arXiv:0910.2097. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2011.08.014.

C. Bény, T. J. Osborne, Information-Geometric Approach to the Renormalization Group, Physical Review A 92 (2) (2015) 022330. arXiv:1206.7004. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.92.022330.

V. Balasubramanian, J. J. Heckman, A. Maloney, Relative Entropy and Proximity of Quantum Field Theories, Journal of High Energy Physics 05 (2015) 104. arXiv:1410.6809. doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2015)104.

H. Casini, E. Testé, G. Torroba, Relative Entropy and the RG Flow, Journal of High Energy Physics 03 (2017) 089. arXiv:1611.00016. doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2017)089.

D. Fraser, A. Koberinski, The Higgs Mechanism and Superconductivity: A Case Study of Formal Analogies, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 55 (2016) 72–91. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2016.08.003.

E. Castellani, On the Meaning of Symmetry Breaking, in: K. Brading, E. Castellani (Eds.), Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003, pp. 321–334. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511535369.019.

CERN, HiLumi LHC, https://home.cern/science/accelerators/hilumi-lhc. CERN official overview of the High-Luminosity LHC project; most installation work is scheduled during the four-year accelerator shutdown beginning in mid-2026, with operation expected in mid-2030. Accessed 15 July 2026.

S. Coleman, E. Weinberg, Radiative Corrections as the Origin of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking, Physical Review D 7 (6) (1973) 1888–1910. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.7.1888.

S. Kullback, R. A. Leibler, On Information and Sufficiency, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 22 (1) (1951) 79–86. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729694.

L. M. Bregman, The Relaxation Method of Finding the Common Point of Convex Sets and Its Application to the Solution of Problems in Convex Programming, USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics 7 (3) (1967) 200–217. doi:10.1016/0041-5553(67)90040-7.

I. Csiszár, Information-Type Measures of Difference of Probability Distributions and Indirect Observations, Studia Scientiarum Mathematicarum Hungarica 2 (1967) 299–318.

T. Imaizumi, An Inverse Variational Characterization of the Kullback–Leibler Divergence, Jxiv preprint, Version 1 (Jan. 2026). doi:10.51094/jxiv.2883.

ダウンロード

公開済


投稿日時: 2026-03-10 00:54:06 UTC

公開日時: 2026-03-26 10:16:50 UTC — 2026-08-06 04:38:32 UTCに更新

バージョン

改版理由

改訂内容の要約(Ver. 1 → Ver. 2) 維持された枠組み Ver. 2は、Ver. 1の核心を変更していない。すなわち、ρ ≡ 2H†H ≥ 0 と ψ = ρ/v² > 0 上のdomain-firstな定式化、excess汎関数をスケールを除いて ψ − 1 − ln ψ に固定するR0–R2の下での条件付きKL剛性(Appendix Bは不変)、相関した微分タワーを伴う予言 κ_λ^vac = −1/3、そして反証アーキテクチャの全体——三層interpretation map、matched truncationを伴う最小confounder集合、gg → hh におけるsign-firstゲート、および生存後監査——である。   改訂点 (1) 境界幾何の本文命題への昇格(最大の追加)。 §4.3は有限端点 h → −v⁺ を座標極限 ξ = ln ψ → −∞ から区別し、後者だけでは無限距離を意味しないことを注記する。その上で命題5.2は、選択された生成関数が ψ → 0⁺ をポテンシャル超過・Hessian距離・anchored Bregman発散の三点で同時に無限遠に置くことを示す——従来Appendixレベルにあったスケール幾何を一つの境界命題へ統合したものであり、力学的到達不可能性の定理ではないという留保付きである。   (2) R2の斉次的精密化。 「constant + reciprocal」の最小性を次数0と−1の連続斉次型により定式化した。span{1, ψ⁻¹} の完全性は、宣言されたtwo-degree grammarに対する条件付きのものであり、普遍的なものではない。   (3) 超伝導類比の批判の新設(§2.4)。 完全に新規の節である。Fraser–Koberinskiに従い、Ginzburg–Landau類比は主に形式的であり、H†H = 0 を通常の内部点として扱うことを正当化できないことを示す。この節はログ障壁を導出するものでも、κ_λ^vac = −1/3 を支持するものでもない。   (4) 閉包破れの分類(Appendix E.1)。 不変のトップループ具体例に加えて、残差ドリフト δD(ψ) の五類型分類と応力比 R_cl(ψ) を導入した。§9.2ではドリフトを無次元の D_eff(ψ) として書き直したが、物理的には旧形式と等価である。   (5) RGとの関係の慎重化(Appendix F.5)。 RG単調性とfield-domain barrierは「conceptually adjacent but logically distinct(概念的に隣接するが論理的には別個)」と位置づけられ、定理レベルの結びつきは主張も使用もされていない。   (6) 編集上の更新。 タイトルとアブストラクトの改訂。§8.4にLS3/HL-LHCの文脈と新規参照を追加。参考文献リストの整備。
研究分野
物理学