プレプリント / バージョン4

Domain-First Rigidity of the Higgs Potential: A Fluctuation Principle and the Tree-Level Prediction κ_λ^vac = −1/3

##article.authors##

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51094/jxiv.3329

キーワード:

Higgs potential、 Higgs self-couplings、 electroweak symmetry breaking、 effective field theory、 statistical response、 Kullback–Leibler divergence、 gamma distribution、 exponential family、 information geometry、 model identifiability

抄録

Given the electroweak vacuum location and Higgs mass, what physical postulates can relate nonlinear Higgs self-interactions left undetermined in a general effective description? We propose a statistical-response construction based on a fixed positive dimensionless state intensity X. Its mean is identified with the Higgs background, while constrained forward Kullback–Leibler (KL) minimization selects the corresponding state distribution and its minimum cost is mapped to the leading-order potential energy. Requiring constant relative variance along the minimizing linear-source family characterizes, under stated regularity conditions, a gamma reference law and selects V_LO(ψ) − V_LO(1) = ¼m_h²v²(ψ − 1 − ln ψ). With standard kinetic and gauge–Yukawa interactions retained, this gives the vacuum coupling ratios (κ_λ^vac, κ₄^vac) = (−1/3, 1) relative to Standard Model tree values and fixes the higher vacuum derivatives of the potential with respect to the canonical radial Higgs field. A correlated Gaussian state model realizes the response with a unique KL minimum over all admissible distributions and shows that the retained observable, not Gaussianity alone, is essential. The cubic ratio remains invariant under a specified class of smooth nonlinear energy maps, while comparison models expose finite-order identification limits. Scalar one-loop nonclosure requires an enlarged effective field theory and finite matching beyond vacuum–curvature alignment. The microscopic realization of the proposed correspondence in the physical quantum vacuum remains open. The resulting action and sensitivity relations provide a concrete starting point for gg → hh rate and invariant-mass calculations.

利益相反に関する開示

The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest.

ダウンロード *前日までの集計結果を表示します

ダウンロード実績データは、公開の翌日以降に作成されます。

引用文献

Takeo Imaizumi. Domain-first rigidity of the Higgs potential: Scale covariance, a positive-domain log barrier, and the prediction κ_λ^vac = −1/3. Jxiv preprint (not peer reviewed), August 2026. doi: 10.51094/jxiv.3329. URL: https://jxiv.jst.go.jp/index.php/jxiv/preprint/view/3329/13174. Version 3, published 18 August 2026. Version-specific PDF record, accessed 8 September 2026.

Biagio Di Micco, Maxime Gouzevitch, Javier Mazzitelli, Caterina Vernieri, et al. Higgs boson potential at colliders: Status and perspectives. Reviews in Physics, 5:100045, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.revip.2020.100045.

Ilaria Brivio and Michael Trott. The Standard Model as an effective field theory. Physics Reports, 793:1–98, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2018.11.002.

Timothy Cohen, Nathaniel Craig, Xiaochuan Lu, and Dave Sutherland. Is SMEFT enough? Journal of High Energy Physics, 03:237, 2021. doi: 10.1007/JHEP03(2021)237.

Adam Falkowski and Riccardo Rattazzi. Which EFT. Journal of High Energy Physics, 10:255, 2019. doi: 10.1007/JHEP10(2019)255.

Carl N. Morris. Natural exponential families with quadratic variance functions. The Annals of Statistics, 10(1):65–80, 1982. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176345690. Earlier version: RAND P-6637 (1981).

Arindam Banerjee, Srujana Merugu, Inderjit S. Dhillon, and Joydeep Ghosh. Clustering with Bregman divergences. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 6:1705–1749, 2005. URL: https://www.jmlr.org/papers/v6/banerjee05b.html.

Nagisa Hiroshima, Mitsuru Kakizaki, and Shuhei Ohzawa. Classifying extended Higgs models through the trilinear Higgs boson coupling measurement at future colliders. Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2026(2):023B03, 2026. doi: 10.1093/ptep/ptag001.

Henning Bahl, Johannes Braathen, Martin Gabelmann, and Georg Weiglein. anyH3: Precise predictions for the trilinear Higgs coupling in the Standard Model and beyond. The European Physical Journal C, 83:1156, 2023. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-12173-8. Erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 498 (2024), doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12848-w.

Steven Abel and Alberto Mariotti. Novel Higgs potentials from gauge mediation of exact scale breaking. Physical Review D, 89:125018, 2014. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.125018. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.5335v2. Comparison uses Eqs. (1)–(3) of arXiv:1312.5335v2.

W. Buchmüller, Z. Fodor, and A. Hebecker. Gauge invariant treatment of the electroweak phase transition. Physics Letters B, 331:131–136, 1994. doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(94)90953-9. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9403391.

Solomon Kullback and Richard A. Leibler. On information and sufficiency. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 22(1):79–86, 1951. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177729694.

Rodrigo Alonso, Elizabeth E. Jenkins, and Aneesh V. Manohar. A geometric formulation of Higgs effective field theory: Measuring the curvature of scalar field space. Physics Letters B, 754:335–342, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2016.01.041.

Imre Csiszár. I-divergence geometry of probability distributions and minimization problems. The Annals of Probability, 3(1):146–158, 1975. doi: 10.1214/aop/1176996454.

Stefan Floerchinger and Tobias Haas. Thermodynamics from relative entropy. Physical Review E, 102:052117, 2020. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.102.052117. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.13533.

D. Petz and G. Tóth. The Bogoliubov inner product in quantum statistics. Letters in Mathematical Physics, 27:205–216, 1993. doi: 10.1007/BF00739578.

Giuseppe Degrassi, Pier Paolo Giardino, Fabio Maltoni, and Davide Pagani. Probing the Higgs self coupling via single Higgs production at the LHC. JHEP, 12:080, 2016. doi: 10.1007/JHEP12(2016)080. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.04251v3.

Takeo Imaizumi. Optimal entropic dimensionality: A continuous variational principle for geometric equilibrium. Jxiv preprint (not peer reviewed), December 2025. doi: 10.51094/jxiv.2161. Version 1.

Takeo Imaizumi. A geometric representation of the second law in Optimal Entropic Dimensionality. Jxiv preprint (not peer reviewed), 2026. doi: 10.51094/jxiv.2601. URL: https://jxiv.jst.go.jp/index.php/jxiv/preprint/view/2601. Version 1.

Udo Seifert. Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation theorems, and molecular machines. Reports on Progress in Physics, 75:126001, 2012. doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/75/12/126001. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1205.4176.

C. P. Burgess, R. Holman, G. Tasinato, and M. Williams. EFT beyond the horizon: Stochastic inflation and how primordial quantum fluctuations go classical. Journal of High Energy Physics, 03:090, 2015. doi: 10.1007/JHEP03(2015)090. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1408.5002.

Sidney Coleman and Erick Weinberg. Radiative corrections as the origin of spontaneous symmetry breaking. Physical Review D, 7(6):1888–1910, 1973. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.7.1888.

Stephen P. Martin. Taming the Goldstone contributions to the effective potential. Physical Review D, 90(1):016013, 2014. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.016013.

N. K. Nielsen. On the gauge dependence of spontaneous symmetry breaking in gauge theories. Nuclear Physics B, 101(1):173–188, 1975. doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(75)90301-6.

Gerhard Buchalla, Oscar Catà, Alejandro Celis, Marc Knecht, and Claudius Krause. Higgs-electroweak chiral lagrangian: One-loop renormalization group equations. Physical Review D, 104:076005, 2021. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.076005.

Hamza Abouabid et al. HHH whitepaper. The European Physical Journal C, 84:1183, 2024. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13376-3.

ATLAS Collaboration and CMS Collaboration. Combination of ATLAS and CMS searches for Higgs boson pair production at √s = 13 TeV. Physical Review Letters, 2026. doi: 10.1103/27s7-2frt. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.23991v2. Accepted 19 May 2026; comparison uses arXiv:2602.23991v2, 3 March 2026.

ATLAS Collaboration. Combination of Higgs boson measurements at √s = 13 TeV and their interpretations by the ATLAS experiment. arXiv preprint, 2026. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2608.07332. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07332v1. CERN-EP-2026-228; submitted to Reports on Progress in Physics.

CMS Collaboration. Search for nonresonant triple Higgs boson production in the final state with six bottom quarks in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV. arXiv preprint, 2026. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2607.05145. URL: https://cms-results.web.cern.ch/cms-results/public-results/publications/HIG-24-012/. CMS-HIG-24-012; CERN-EP-2026-157; arXiv:2607.05145v1; released 6 July 2026; submitted to Physical Review Letters.

Markus Schröfl and Stefan Floerchinger. Relative entropy and mutual information in Gaussian statistical field theory. Annales Henri Poincaré, 26:3233–3319, 2025. doi: 10.1007/s00023-024-01522-2. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.15548. arXiv:2307.15548.

National Institute of Standards and Technology. DLMF: Quadrature, section 3.5(v). Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, n.d. URL: https://dlmf.nist.gov/3.5#v. Gauss quadrature and the Gauss–Laguerre formula; accessed 8 September 2026.

Yuliya Mishura, Andrey Pilipenko, and Anton Yurchenko-Tytarenko. Low-dimensional Cox–Ingersoll–Ross process. Stochastics, 96(5):1530–1550, 2024. doi: 10.1080/17442508.2023.2300291. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.12911.

ダウンロード

公開済


投稿日時: 2026-03-10 00:54:06 UTC

公開日時: 2026-03-26 10:16:50 UTC — 2026-08-12 06:32:36 UTCに更新

バージョン

改版理由

Ver.3 → Ver.4 変更していない内容: 対数型ポテンシャルとその規格化、標準的なヒッグス運動項とゲージ・湯川相互作用は不変である。三点・四点自己結合の標準模型の木レベル値に対する比 (−1/3, 1) と、正準ヒッグス場についてのポテンシャルの真空高階微分系列も維持する。質量と真空スケールは入力であり、予測は明示した仮定の下で成立する。 主な変更点: 1. 選択原理の再定式化 状態強度の定義と参照分布を固定し、分布の変化を考える。平均と背景の対応、費用のエネルギー換算、ゆらぎ応答、標準運動構造の役割を四つの仮定として分離し、選択原理を統計的応答の構成として再定式化した。 2. 統計的応答からの導出 固定参照分布に対する、平均制約付きの順方向相対エントロピー最小化を導入した。指定したゆらぎ応答と正則性条件の下で、ガンマ参照分布と対数型費用を得る。 3. 相関状態と観測量の選択 固定参照共分散の逆行列で測る二乗強度を用い、有限次元の相関ガウス模型を追加した。観測量選択の重要性と、全許容分布に対する費用の最小性を示した。 4. 隠れた構造と粗視化 観測しない変数を消去しても静的費用が保たれる十分条件を示した。混合や粗視化の変更が応答に与える影響も整理した。 5. 平衡・緩和・伝播の区別 確率過程と空間費用の比較により、静的な応答だけでは緩和や標準的な伝播が定まらないことを示した。標準的な伝播は、本稿では独立の仮定である。 6. 感度解析と局所的な頑健性 各仮定の変更が自己結合に与える影響を計算した。真空三点結合を保ちながら、四点結合が変わり得る条件を示した。また、指定したフルランク正定値ガウス二次観測量のクラスでは、主観測量が局所的な境界 κ₃ ≤ −1/3 を飽和することを示した。 7. 低次結合からの識別限界 安定多項式と離散分布の例を加え、低次結合の一致だけでは対数ポテンシャルや状態分布を同定できないことを具体化した。 8. 一ループ繰り込みとマッチング 元の作用はスカラー一ループ繰り込みで閉じない。拡張した有効場理論の有限係数には追加のマッチング情報を要する。真空・ゼロ運動量曲率の整列と、極質量へのマッチングを区別した。 9. 幾何学的な比較の訂正 非整数冪も正領域上では局所的となり得ると訂正し、通常の二階微分と共変二階微分による選択を区別した。比較族の範囲と境界発散に関する主張も限定した。 10. 定量的主張の見直し 部分的一ループ補正は完全な理論誤差帯とは扱わない。旧版の数TeVの完備化尺度と、木レベル三点結合の6~13%の最小シフトは、確立した限界としては継承しない。
研究分野
物理学