プレプリント / バージョン1

Anomalous biases of reverse mutations in SARS-CoV-2 variants

##article.authors##

  • Kakeya, Hideki Institute of Systems and Information Engineering, University of Tsukuba https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3788-9133
  • Tatsuya Kanzaki Graduate School of Science and Technology, University of Tsukuba

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51094/jxiv.545

キーワード:

SARS-CoV-2、 variant of concerns、 reverse mutation、 point mutation、 homologous recombination

抄録

Anomalous reverse mutation patterns in the Delta variants and the Omicron variants are investigated. A previous study on the Omicron BA.1, BA.1.1, and BA.2 has found almost all the variations of sequences containing only one reverse mutation and no other point mutations, suggesting lab origin of the Omicron variant. The histograms of mutations in the spike proteins of major variants are compared, where BA.1 is outstanding in its high reverse mutation rate and low variety of mutations. Among the reverse mutations of BA.1, H681P reversion while preserving K679 is least likely to emerge naturally either through homologous recombination, point mutation, or both of them put together when the sequence alignment and mutation spectrum are taken into account. The sequences including both K679 and P681 are registered by multiple submitters, which consolidates their existence. G614D reverse mutations, a reversion of the earliest and the most dominant point mutation in SARS-CoV-2, in the Delta variant are concentrated around the Great Lakes and G614D in the BA.2 lineage are concentrated on each side of the Hudson River. To elucidate the origin of these sequences that are improbable to emerge through community spread, inspections of laboratories are needed, where the geographical distribution of anomalous sequence detections can help to narrow down the potential sources.

利益相反に関する開示

The authors declare no conflict of interests exist.

ダウンロード *前日までの集計結果を表示します

ダウンロード実績データは、公開の翌日以降に作成されます。

引用文献

Callaway E. Heavily mutated Omicron variant puts scientists on alert. Nature 2021;600(7887):21. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-021-03552-w

Jung C, Kmiec, D, Koepke L, et al. Omicron: what makes the latest SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern so concerning? J Virology 2022;96(6): e02077-21. DOI: 10.1128/jvi.02077-21

Hassan SS, Kodakandla V, Redwan EM, et al. Non-uniform aspects of the SARS-CoV-2 intraspecies evolution reopen question of its origin. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 2022; 222:972-993. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.09.184

Mallapaty C. The hunt for the origin of Omicron. Nature 2022;602(7898):26-28. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-022-00215-2

Jung C, Kmiec, D, Koepke L, et al. Omicron: what makes the latest SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern so concerning? J Virology 2022;96(6): e02077-21. DOI: 10.1128/jvi.02077-21

Choi B, Choudhary MC, Regan J, et al. Persistence and Evolution of SARS-CoV-2 in an Immunocompromised Host. The New England Journal of Medicine 2020;383(23):2291-2293. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2031364

Kemp SA, Collier DA, Datier RP, et al. SARS-CoV-2 evolution during treatment of chronic infection. Nature 2021;592:277-282. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03291-y

Truong TT, Ryutov A, Pandey U, et al. Increased viral variants in children and young adults with impaired humoral immunity and persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection: A consecutive case series. EBioMedicine 2021 May;67:103355. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103355

Miyata T, Yasunaga T. Molecular evolution of mRNA: A method for estimating evolutionary rates of synonymous and amino acid substitutions from homologous nucleotide sequences and its application. J Molecular Evolution 1980;16(1):23–36. DOI: 10.1007/BF01732067

Li WH, Wu CI, Luo CC. A new method for estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous rates of nucleotide substitution considering the relative likelihood of nucleotide and codon changes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 1985;2(2):150–174. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040343

Wei C, Shan KJ, Wang W, et al. Evidence for a mouse origin of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. J Genet Genomics 2021;48(12):1111-1121. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgg.2021.12.003

Kryazhimskiy S, Plotkin JB, The population genetics of dN/dS. PLOS Genetics 2008;4(12):e1000304. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000304

Hasan Z, Hasan M, Ashik AI, et al. Prediction of immune pressure on HIV-1 regulatory gene tat by human host through bioinformatics tools. J Adv Biotechnol Exp Ther. 2020 Sep;3(3):233-240. DOI: 10.5455/jabet.2020.d129

Zhan SH, Deverman BE, Chan YA. SARS-CoV-2 is well adapted for humans. What does this mean for re-emergence? bioRxiv 2020. DOI: 10.1101/2020.05.01.073262

Zhang W, Shi K, Geng Q, et al. Structural basis for mouse receptor recognition by SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant. PNAS 2022; 119(44): e2206509119. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2206509119

Piplani S, Singh PK, Winkler DA, et al. In silico comparison of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-ACE2 binding affinities across species and implications for virus origin. Science Report 2021;11:13063. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92388-5

Kakeya H, Matsumoto Y. A probabilistic approach to evaluate the likelihood of artificial genetic modification and its application to SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. ISPJ Trans. Bioinformatics 2022;15:22-29. DOI: 10.2197/ipsjtbio.15.22

Kakeya H, Arakawa H, Matsumoto Y. Multiple probabilistic analyses suggest non-natural origin of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. Zenodo 2023. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7470652

Arakawa H. Mutation signature of SARS-CoV-2 variants raises questions to their natural origins. Zenodo 2022. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6601991

Tanaka A, Miyazawa T. Unnaturalness in the evolution process of the SARS-CoV-2 variants and the possibility of deliberate natural selection. Zenodo 2023. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8361577

Kakeya H, Matsumoto Y. Repeated emergence of probabilistically and chronologically anomalous mutations in SARS-CoV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic. Zenodo 2023. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8216232

Korber B, Fischer WM, Gnanakaran S, et al. Tracking changes in SARS-CoV-2 spike: evidence that D614G increases infectivity of the COVID-19 virus. Cell 2020; 182(4), 812-827. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.043

Volz E, Hill V, McCrone JT, et al. Evaluating the effects of SARS-CoV-2 spike mutation D614G on transmissibility and pathogenicity, Cell 2021; 184(1), 64-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.020

Selective Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic (United States House). Letter to CIA Director William Burns, September 12, 2023. https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/2023.09.12-SSCP-HPSCI-Letter-to-CIA-Re.-Origins-of-COVID.pdf [cited Oct 28, 2023]

Selective Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic (United States House). Letter to OIG, September 26, 2023. https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/2023.09.26-SSCP-Letter-to-HHS-OIG-Re.-AF-Movements.pdf [cited Oct 28, 2023]

Shan KJ, Wei C, Wang Y, et al. Host-specific asymmetric accumulation of mutation types reveals that the origin of SARS-CoV-2 is consistent with a natural process. Innovation 2021;2(4), 100159. DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100159

Hou YJ, Chiba S, Halfmann P, et al. SARS-CoV-2 D614G variant exhibits efficient replication ex vivo and transmission in vivo, Science 2020;370(6523):1464-1468 DOI: 10.1126/science.abe8499

Silver A. Taiwan’s science academy fined for biosafety lapses after lab worker contracts COVID-19. Science 2022. DOI: 10.1126/science.ada0525

Butler D. Fears grow over lab-bred flu. Nature 2011;480(7378):421–422. DOI: 10.1038/480421a

Biosafety in the balance. Nature 2014;510(7506):443. DOI: 10.1038/510443a

Young A. Pandora's gamble: lab leaks, pandemics, and a world at risk. Center Street 2023. ISBN-13: 978-1546002932

Meselson M, Guillemin J, Hugh-Jones M. The Sverdlovsk Anthrax Outbreak of 1979. Science 1994;266(5188):1202-1208. DOI: 10.1126/science.7973702

Kransnitz M, Levine AJ, Rabadan R. Anomalies in the Influenza Virus Genome Database: New Biology or Laboratory Errors? J Virol. 2008 Sep;82(17):8947-50. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00101-08.

Pfizer, Pfizer responds to research claims. January 27, 2023. https://www.pfizer.com/news/announcements/pfizer-responds-research-claims

Sallard E, Halloy J, Casane D, et al. Tracing the origins of SARS-COV-2 in coronavirus phylogenies: a review. Environ Chem Lett 2021;19(4), 769-785. DOI: 10.1007/s10311-020-01151-1

Segreto R, Deigin Y, McCairn K, et al. Should we discount the laboratory origin of COVID-19? Environ Chem Lett 2021;Mar 15, 1-15 DOI: 10.1007/s10311-021-01211-0

Quay SC. A Bayesian analysis concludes beyond a reasonable doubt that SARS-CoV-2 is not a natural zoonosis but instead is laboratory derived, Zenodo 2021. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4477081

Wiesendanger R. Studie zum Ursprung der Coronavirus-Pandemie. ResearchGate 2021. DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.31754.80323

Markson S. What really happened in Wuhan. HarperCollins 2021. ISBN-13: 978-1460761083

Chan AJ and Ridley M. Viral: the search for the origin of Covid-19. Fourth Estate 2021. ISBN-13: 978-0008487492

Harrison NL, Sachs JD. A call for an independent inquiry into the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, PNAS 2022;119(21):e2202769119 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2202769119

Coccia M. Meta-analysis to explain unknown causes of the origins of SARS-CoV-2, Environmental Research 2022; 211:113062 DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113062

Gordon MR. U.S.-funded scientist among three Chinese researchers who fell ill amid early Covid-19 outbreak. Wall Street Journal June 20, 2023. https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-funded-scientist-among-three-chinese-researchers-who-fell-ill-amid-early-covid-19-outbreak-3f919567 [cited Oct 28, 2023]

ダウンロード

公開済


投稿日時: 2023-10-31 01:13:05 UTC

公開日時: 2023-11-17 00:39:01 UTC
研究分野
生物学・生命科学・基礎医学