プロジェクト・チームの事業創造メカニズムへの 組織上位層の影響
##article.authors##
-
竹田, 陽子
中央大学
https://researchmap.jp/read0162616
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51094/jxiv.5365キーワード:
多元的視点取得、 外部ネットワーク、 ネットワーク多様性、 創造的成果、 内的整合性、 創造性阻害抄録
Abstract: This study investigates how interactions with external networks—categorized into outside organizations, internal upper management, and internal peers—affect the creative performance of business creation teams, utilizing a survey of 561 managers involved in business planning projects. The analysis confirms that overall network diversity significantly enhances creative performance both directly and indirectly through multiple perspective-taking. However, significant differences were observed in the breakdown of external networks. While external organizational contact supports creativity up to a high threshold, influence from internal upper management shows an inverse U-shaped relationship, hindering creativity even at relatively low levels of involvement. Unlike external organizational communication, which focuses on finding new information, skill and perspective, internal communication often centers on alignment with internal policies, control and structural inertia, which may restrict the team's cognitive diversity. The study concludes that while internal integration is necessary for internal resource acquisition, excessive intervention from upper layers can suppress the creative mechanisms essential for innovation.
利益相反に関する開示
本研究に関して、開示すべき利益相反はない。ダウンロード *前日までの集計結果を表示します
引用文献
Allen, T. J. (1977). Managing the flow of technology: Technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information within the R&D organization. MIT Press.
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123–167.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Westview Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429501234
Ancona, D. G. (1990). Outward bound: Strategies for team survival in an organization. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 334–365. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1990-27049-001
Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4), 634–665. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393475
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 343–378. https://doi.org/10.2307/258850
Clark, K., & Fujimoto, T. (1991). Product development performance: Strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry. Harvard Business School Press.
Droge, C., Jayaram, J., & Vickery, S. K. (2004). The effects of internal versus external integration practices on time‐based performance and overall firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 22(6), 557–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2004.08.001
Horwitz, S. K., & Horwitz, I. B. (2007). The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. Journal of Management, 33(6), 987–1015. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308587
Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1128–1145. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015978
Joshi, A., & Knight, A. P. (2015). Who defers to whom and why? Dual pathways linking demographic differences and dyadic difference to team effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 58(1), 59–84. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0718
Kirton, M. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(5), 622–629. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.61.5.622
Marrone, J. A. (2010). Team boundary spanning: A multilevel review of past research and proposals for the future. Journal of management, 36(4), 911–940. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309353945
Reynolds, J. L. (2006). Measuring intrinsic motivations. In R. A. Reynolds, R. Woods, & J. D. Baker, (Eds.), Handbook of research on electronic surveys and measurements (pp. 170–173). IDEA Group. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-792-8
Takeda, Y. (2022). Tagenteki shitenshutoku ga sozoteki seika ni ataeru eikyo [Influence of multiple perspective-taking on creative performance]. Shoshiki kagaku [Organizational Science], 56(1), 60–72 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.11207/soshikikagaku.20211001-2
Takeda, Y. (2023). Kyokan sozo [Multiple perspective-taking in creative process]. Hakutoshobo (in Japanese). https://www.hakutou.co.jp/book/b624450.html
Takeda, Y. (2024). Senryaku sozo niokeru timu toshiteno tagenteki shitenshutoku to tayosei, Nettowaku no kankei [Multiple perspective-taking, diversity, and external network in strategy development]. AAOS Transactions, 13(1), 22–30 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.11207/aaostrans.2024-009
Takeda, Y. (2025). Kigyo senryaku wo umidasu timuwaku: Senryaku sozosei wo takameru tagenteki shitenshutoku [Teamwork for creating corporate strategy: Enhancing strategic creativity through multiple perspective-taking]. In H. Horii, (Ed.), Timuwaku wo kagakusuru [The science of teamwork: how to build teams that drive innovation] (pp. 75–92). Tokyo University Press (in Japanese). https://www.utp.or.jp/book/b10140183.html
Tushman, M. L., & Katz, R. (1980). External communication and project performance: An investigation into the role of gatekeepers. Management Science, 26(11), 1071–1085. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.1980.4976212
von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32(7), 791–805. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.7.791
Williams, K. Y., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In B. Staws (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior 20 (pp. 77–140). Elsevier.
ダウンロード
公開済
投稿日時: 2026-07-03 05:19:07 UTC
公開日時: 2026-07-21 04:02:49 UTC
ライセンス
Copyright（c）2026
竹田, 陽子
この作品は、Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licenseの下でライセンスされています。
