H-Rサンプリングと局所接空間の貼り合わせによる 三次元ラプラシアン平滑化制約を活用した 解探索空間のatlas型次元削減法

R. E. Bellman, Dynamic Programming. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1957.

R. C. Aster, B. Borchers, and C. H. Thurber, Parameter Estimation and Inverse Problems, 2nd ed. Academic Press, 2013.

A. Tarantola, Inverse Problem Theory: Methods for Data Fitting and Model Parameter Estimation. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1987.

村上章，長谷川高士，Kalmanフィルタを用いた圧密沈下量の観測的予測，農業土木学会論文集，vol. 120 (1985), 61--67.

村上章，長谷川高士，Kalmanフィルタ有限要素法による逆解析と観測節点配置，土木学会論文集，第388号/III-8 (1987), 227--235.

村上章，構造工学・地盤工学における Kalman フィルタの適用，土木学会論文集，1992.

長谷川高士，村上章，Kalmanフィルターによるダム漏水量の予測，農業土木学会論文集，1986.

T. Kawamoto and Y. Ichikawa, eds., Observational prediction of settlement using Kalman filter theory. In Numerical Methods in Geomechanics, 1985.

村上章・登坂宣好・堀宗朗・鈴木誠（編著），有限要素法・境界要素法による逆問題解析 — カルマンフィルタと等価介在物法の応用，コロナ社，2002.

A. Sutoh, 拡張カルマンフィルタの基本的考察とEK-WLI法の提案，土木学会論文集，1991.

松倉敏寛，時空間交互最適化による高速感度算定に基づく非均質なコンクリート供試体の応力ひずみ曲線逆推定法，日本計算工学会論文集 26 巻 2 号 (2024), 1--13.

B. Chen, B. Starman, M. Halilović, L. A. Berglund, and S. Coppieters, Finite Element Model Updating for Material Model Calibration, A Review and Guide to Practice. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, vol. 32 (2025), 2035--2112.

D. E. Goldberg, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, 1989.

J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart, Particle Swarm Optimization. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Neural Networks (1995), 1942--1948.

J. J. Jamian, M. N. Abdullah, H. Mokhlis, M. W. Mustafa, and A. H. A. Bakar, Global Particle Swarm Optimization for High Dimension Numerical Functions Analysis. The Scientific World Journal, 2014.

Jan Macháček, Patrick Staubach, Carlos E. G. Tavera, Torsten Wichtmann, and Hauke Zachert, On the automatic parameter calibration of a hypoplastic soil model. Acta Geotechnica, vol. 17 (2022), 5253--5273.

Long, L., Li, Y., Yang, P., and Tang, B., Parameter Identification of a Soil Constitutive Model Based on a Hybrid Genetic–Differential Evolution Algorithm. Buildings, 14(11), 2024.

A. V. Grayver and A. V. Kuvshinov, Exploring equivalence domain in nonlinear inverse problems using Covariance Matrix Adaption Evolution Strategy (CMAES) and random sampling. Geophysical Journal International, vol. 205 (2016).

K. Beven and J. Freer, Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology. Journal of Hydrology, vol. 249 (2001), 11--29.

Y. Li, Y. Wang, and L. Yan, Surrogate modeling for Bayesian inverse problems based on physics-informed neural networks. Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 475 (2023), 111841.

G. Song et al., Bayesian Inference With Gaussian Process Surrogates to Characterize Anisotropic Mechanical Properties of Skin From Suction Tests. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering (ASME), vol. 144, no. 12, 2022.

P. Erşin, E. Hayes, P. Matthews, P. Mohapatra, E. Negrini, and K. Schulz, Applications of ML-Based Surrogates in Bayesian Approaches to Inverse Problems. arXiv:2310.12046, 2023.

R. B. Gramacy, Surrogates: Gaussian Process Modeling, Design and Optimization for the Applied Sciences. Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2020.

C. He, Y. Zhang, D. Gong, and X. Ji, A review of surrogate-assisted evolutionary algorithms for expensive optimization problems. Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 217 (2023), 119495.

S. Liu, H. Wang, W. Peng, and W. Yao, Surrogate-assisted evolutionary algorithms for expensive combinatorial optimization, a survey. Complex & Intelligent Systems, vol. 10 (2024), 5933--5949.

A. V. Fiacco and G. P. McCormick, Nonlinear Programming: Sequential Unconstrained Minimization Techniques. Wiley, 1968.

D. P. Bertsekas, On Penalty and Multiplier Methods for Constrained Minimization. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 1976.

G. Di Pillo, Exact Penalty Functions in Constrained Optimization. 1989.

D. P. Bertsekas, Enhanced Optimality Conditions and Exact Penalty. 2000.

L. Chen and K. Deb, Effect of Objective Normalization and Penalty Parameter on Penalty Boundary Intersection Decomposition-Based Evolutionary Many-objective Optimization Algorithms. Evolutionary Computation, vol. 29, no. 1 (2021), 157--186.

松倉敏寛，デュアルプロセス理論に基づく論理命題との直感的な矛盾解消が可能な組み合わせ探索方法の開発と地盤同定への適用性検証，preprint / JrXiv10.51094, 2026.

M. Calvello and R. J. Finno, Selecting parameters to optimize in model calibration by inverse analysis. Computers and Geotechnics, vol. 31, no. 5 (2004), 410--424.

Z. B. Zabinsky, R. L. Smith, J. F. McDonald, H. E. Romeijn, and D. E. Kaufman, Improving Hit-and-Run for Global Optimization. Mathematical/Global Optimization, 1993.

Huseyin Onur Mete, Y. Shen, Z. B. Zabinsky, S. Kiatsupaibul, and R. L. Smith, Pattern, Discrete and Mixed Hit-and-Run for Global Optimization. Journal of Global Optimization, 2011.

Guillaume Gautier, R. Bardenet, and M. Valko, Zonotope Hit-and-Run for Efficient Sampling from Projection DPPs. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning (PMLR 70) (2017), 1223--1232.

H. S. Haraldsdóttir et al., CHRR: Coordinate Hit-and-Run with Rounding for Uniform Sampling of Constraint-based Models. Bioinformatics, 2017.

Y. Abbasi-Yadkori, P. L. Bartlett, V. Gabillon, and A. Malek, Hit-and-Run for Sampling and Planning in Non-Convex Spaces. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS; PMLR 54) (2017), 888--895.

H. Sun, K. Goshvadi, A. Nova, D. Schuurmans, and H. Dai, Revisiting Sampling for Combinatorial Optimization. ICML / PMLR, 2023.

Y. Wu, A. Bojchevski, A. Kuvshinov, and S. Günnemann, Completing the Picture: Randomized Smoothing Suffers from the Curse of Dimensionality for a Large Family of Distributions. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS), PMLR, vol. 130 (2021), 3763--3771.

X. Mai and R. Couillet, Consistent Semi-Supervised Graph Regularization for High Dimensional Data. Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 22 (2021), 1--48.

F. Mignacco, F. Krzakala, Y. M. Lu, P. Urbani, and L. Zdeborová, The Role of Regularization in Classification of High-dimensional Noisy Gaussian Mixture. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning (PMLR 119) (2020), 6874--6883.

C. Thrampoulidis, E. Abbasi, and B. Hassibi, Precise Error Analysis of Regularized M-estimators in High-dimensions. arXiv:1601.06233, 2016.

M. C. Zhou, M. Cui, et al., Evolutionary Optimization Methods for High-Dimensional Expensive Problems: A Survey. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica (online), 2024.

Q. Dai, H. Zhang, and B. Zhang, An Improved Particle Swarm Optimization Based on Total Variation Regularization and Projection Constraint with Applications in Ground-Penetrating Radar Inversion: A Model Simulation Study. Remote Sensing, vol. 13 (2021), article 2514.

Xiao Lin, Alternating Linearization for Structured Regularization Problems. Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 15 (2014), 3447--3482.

K. J. Friston and S. J. Kiebel, Predictive coding under the free-energy principle. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, vol. 372, no. 1719 , 2016.

A. Clark, Surfing Uncertainty: Prediction, Action, and the Embodied Mind. Oxford University Press, 2016.

G. Pezzulo, The value of uncertainty: an active inference perspective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2019.

K. Friston, F. Rigoli, and G. Pezzulo, Active Inference and epistemic value. 2015.

Tarantola, A., Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Estimation. SIAM, 2005.

Kaipio, J., & Somersalo, E., Statistical and Computational Inverse Problems. Springer, 2005. [52] Vogel, C. R., Computational Methods for Inverse Problems. SIAM, 2002.

Gallet, A., et al., “Structural engineering from an inverse problems perspective, Proceedings of the Royal Society A, vol.478, no.2257, 2022, 20210526.

Parr, T., Pezzulo, G., & Friston, K. J., Active Inference: The Free Energy Principle in Mind, Brain, and Behavior. MIT Press, 2022.

Knill, D. C., & Pouget, A., “The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation,” Trends in Neurosciences, Vol.27, No.12(2004), 712--719.

Yuille, A., & Kersten, D., “Vision as Bayesian inference: analysis by synthesis?,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol.10, No.7(2006), 301--308.

A. Gilboa and H. Marlatte, Neurobiology of Schemas and Schema-Mediated Memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 21, no. 8 (2017), 618--631.

M. T. R. van Kesteren, D. J. Ruiter, G. Fernández, and R. N. Henson, How schema and novelty augment memory formation. Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 35, no. 4 (2012), 211--219.

P. Seriès and A. R. Seitz, Learning what to expect (in visual perception). Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 7 (2013), article 668.

C. Summerfield and E. Koechlin, A neural representation of prior information during perceptual inference. Neuron, vol. 59, no. 2 (2008), 336--347.

F. J. Varela, The specious present: A neurophenomenology of time consciousness. In Naturalizing Phenomenology: Issues in Contemporary Phenomenology and Cognitive Science (1999), 266--314.

L. W. Barsalou, Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 22, no. 4 (1999), 577--660.

P. Thagard and K. Verbeurgt, Coherence as Constraint Satisfaction. Cognitive Science, vol. 22, no. 1 (1998), 1--24.

D. Simon et al., Construction of Preferences by Constraint Satisfaction, 2004.

D. M. Sanbonmatsu, Selective Hypothesis Testing, 1998.

K. Braunlich et al., Bidirectional Influences of Information Sampling and Concept Learning, 2021.

M. Rollwage et al., Confidence drives a neural confirmation bias. Nature Communications, 2020.

K. Desender, A. Boldt, and N. Yeung, Subjective Confidence Predicts Information Seeking in Decision Making. Psychological Science, 2018.

P. Kaanders et al., Humans actively sample evidence to support prior beliefs. eLife, 2022.

T. Parr and K. Friston, Working Memory, Attention and Salience in Active Inference. Scientific Reports, 2017.

A. Oliva and P. Schyns, Coarse blobs or fine edges? Evidence that information diagnosticity changes the perception of complex visual stimuli. Cognitive Psychology, 1997.

K. McRae and K. Matsuki, Constraint-based models of sentence processing, 2013.

A. Shenhav, M. M. Botvinick, and J. D. Cohen, The expected value of control: An integrative theory of anterior cingulate cortex function. Neuron, vol. 79, no. 2 (2013), 217--240.

J. St. B. T. Evans and K. E. Stanovich, Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 8, no. 3 (2013), 223--241.

A. Fisher and R. Gevgen, Neural Mechanisms of Human Decision-Making, arXiv:1912.07660, 2019.

M. Lengyel, Á. Koblinger, M. Popović, and J. Fiser, On the Role of Time in Perceptual Decision Making. arXiv:1502.03135, 2015.

M. Sherman et al., Beyond the Surface: A New Perspective on Dual-System Theories in Decision-Making. Behavioral Sciences, vol. 14, no. 11 (2024), article 1028.

P. W. Glimcher, Understanding Dopamine and Reinforcement Learning: the dopamine reward prediction error hypothesis. PNAS, vol. 108, Suppl. 3 (2011), 15647--15654.

C. L. Baker, R. Saxe, and J. B. Tenenbaum, Action understanding as inverse planning. Cognition, vol. 113, no. 3 (2009), 329--349.

A. Kangasrääsiö, K. Athukorala, A. Howes, J. Corander, S. Kaski, and A. Oulasvirta, Inferring Cognitive Models from Data using Approximate Bayesian Computation, 2016.

S. T. Radev, A. Voss, E. Wieschen, and P.-C. Bürkner, Amortized Bayesian Inference for Models of Cognition, 2020.

A. N. Sanborn, T. L. Griffiths, and R. M. Shiffrin, Uncovering mental representations with Markov chain Monte Carlo. Cognitive Psychology, 2010.

T. Tervonen, G. van Valkenhoef, N. Baştürk, and D. Postmus, Hit-And-Run enables efficient weight generation for simulation-based multiple criteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 2013.

S. Heidenreich, D. Postmus, and T. Tervonen, Multi-Dimensional Thresholding for Individual-Level Preference Elicitation. Value in Health, 2024.

R. L. Harms and A. Roebroeck, Robust and Fast Markov Chain Monte Carlo Sampling of Diffusion MRI Microstructure Models. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 2018.

Y. Ahmadian, J. W. Pillow, and L. Paninski, Efficient Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods for Decoding Neural Spike Trains. Neural Computation, 2011.

László Lovász & Santosh Vempala. Hit-and-Run from a Corner, SIAM Journal on Computing, 35(4)(2006), 985--1005.

O. Mangoubi and A. Smith, Faster polytope rounding, sampling, and volume computation. arXiv:1905.01745, 2019.

P. Sun and R. M. Freund, Computation of Minimum-Volume Covering Ellipsoids. Operations Research, vol. 52, no. 5 (2004), 690--706.

P. Kumar and E. Alper Yıldırım, Minimum-Volume Enclosing Ellipsoids and Core Sets. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 126, no. 1 (2005), 1--21.

J. A. Tropp, User-Friendly Tail Bounds for Sums of Random Matrices. Foundations of Computational Mathematics, 2012.

R. Vershynin, High-Dimensional Probability: An Introduction with Applications in Data Science. Cambridge University Press, 2018.

C. Davis and W. M. Kahan, The rotation of eigenvectors by a perturbation. III. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, vol. 7, no. 1 (1970), 1--46.

R. Kannan, L. Lovász, and M. Simonovits, Isoperimetric problems for convex bodies and a localization lemma. Discrete & Computational Geometry, vol. 13 (1995), 541--559.

Y. Chen and R. Eldan, Hit-and-run mixing via localization schemes. arXiv:2212.00297, 2022.

B. Cousins and S. Vempala, A cubic algorithm for computing Gaussian volume. SODA, 2014.

Psenka, M., Pai, D., Raman, V., Sastry, S., and Ma, Y., Representation Learning via manifold Flattening and Reconstruction. Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 25 (2024), 1--47.

Zhang, Z., and Zha, H., Principal manifolds and Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction via Tangent Space alignment. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, vol. 26, no. 1 (2004), 313--338.

Pitelis, N., Russell, C., and Agapito, L., Learning a manifold as an Atlas. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2013, pp. 1642--1649.

Wang, C., and Mahadevan, S., manifold alignment using Procrustes Analysis. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on.

Xue, Q., et al., A density-based manifold learning framework for dynamic evolution analysis with autoencoder reduction (DDMAR), 2025.

Kaji, T., A Simulated Annealing Algorithm with the Random Compound Move for the Sequential Partitioning Problem of Directed Acyclic Graphs. European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 112, no. 1 (1999), 147--157.

Kaji, T., and others, 系列分割問題に対する確率的複合移動によるSimulated Annealing法の適用. 情報処理学会論文誌, vol. 38, no. 12 (1997), 2411--2418.

Rosen, B. E., and 中野良平, シミュレーテッドアニーリング, 基礎と最新技術. 人工知能学会誌, vol. 9, no. 3 (1994), 365--372.

Hedar, A.-R., and Fukushima, M., Tabu Search Directed by Direct Search Methods for Nonlinear Global Optimization. European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 170, no. 2 (2006), 329--349.

栗原拓哉, 神野健哉, 時変タブー期間を有するタブーサーチによるTSPの解法. 電子情報通信学会技術研究報告, vol. 110, no. 465(NLP2010-163-196) (2011), 1--6.

野々部宏司, 柳浦睦憲, 局所探索法とその拡張—タブー探索法を中心として. 計測と制御, vol. 47, no. 6 (2008), 493--499.

Contreras-Bolton, C., and Parada, V., Automatic Combination of Operators in a Genetic Algorithm to Solve the Traveling Salesman Problem. PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 9 (2015), e0137724.

Picozzi, M., and Albarello, D., Combining genetic and linearized algorithms for a two-step joint inversion of Rayleigh wave dispersion and H/V spectral ratio curves. Geophysical Journal International, vol. 169, no. 1 (2007), 189--200.

Y. M. A. Hashash, M. I. Musgrove, J. A. Harmon, O. Ilhan, D. R. Groholski, C. A. Phillips, and D. Park, DEEPSOIL User Manual (v7.0): Nonlinear & Equivalent-Linear Seismic Site Response of One-Dimensional Soil Columns. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2018.

J. Kaklamanos, Assessment of 1-D nonlinear site response uncertainty at a large number of vertical seismometer arrays. Final Technical Report, U.S. Geological Survey, Award No. G16AP00002, 2017.

Y. M. A. Hashash, New Trends in Numerical Modeling of Seismic Soil-Structure Interaction. PEER / University of California, Berkeley (presentation slides), 2021.

S. K. Nath, A. Biswas, A. Srivastava, J. Madan, C. Ghatak, A. P. Bind, A. Sengupta, and P. Singh, Site-characterization using 1D/2D/3D Site Response Modelling vis-à-vis Surface-consistent Probabilistic Seismic Hazard, Microzonation and Damage Potential Studies in the Six-Tectonic Ensemble consisting of Kashmir Himalaya to Northeast India. Research Square preprint, 2024.

J. N. Prins, Dynamic Analysis of Soil-Foundation Interaction. M.Sc. project report, Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University, 2016.

T. D. Nguyen and K. T. Tran, Site Characterization with 3-D Elastic Full Waveform Tomography, Geophysics, vol. 83, no. 5(2018), R389--R400.

K. T. Tran, M. Mirzanejad, M. McVay, and D. Horhota, 3-D Time-Domain Gauss-Newton Full Waveform Inversion for Near-Surface Site Characterization, Geophysical Journal International, vol. 217, no. 1(2019), 206--218.

K. T. Tran, D. T. Nguyen, D. R. Hiltunen, K. Stokoe, and F. Menq, 3D Full-Waveform Inversion in Time-Frequency Domain: Field Data Application, Journal of Applied Geophysics, vol. 178, 2020, 104078.

M. Mirzanejad, K. T. Tran, and Y. Wang, 3D Gauss-Newton Constant-Q viscoelastic full-waveform inversion of seismic wavefields, Geophysical Journal International, 2022.

R. L. Smith, Efficient Monte Carlo Procedures for Generating Points Uniformly Distributed over Bounded Regions. Operations Research, vol. 32, no. 6 (1984), 1296--1308.

S. P. Meyn and R. L. Tweedie, Markov Chains and Stochastic Stability. Cambridge University Press, 1993.

Weyl, H., Das asymptotische Verteilungsgesetz der Eigenwerte linearer partieller Differentialgleichungen (mit einer Anwendung auf die Theorie der Hohlraumstrahlung), Mathematische Annalen, 71(4) (1912), 441--479.

N. J. Higham, Functions of Matrices: Theory and Computation, SIAM, 2008.

G. W. Stewart and J.-G. Sun, Matrix Perturbation Theory, Academic Press, 1990．

Levin, Y. Peres and E. L. Wilmer, Markov Chains and Mixing Times, American Mathematical Society, 2009.

P. Diaconis and L. Saloff-Coste, Comparison Theorems for Reversible Markov Chains, Annals of Applied Probability, vol.3, No.3(1993), 696--730.

G. O. Roberts and J. S. Rosenthal, Examples of Adaptive MCMC, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, Vol.18, No.2(2009) 349--367.

H. Haario, E. Saksman and J. Tamminen, An Adaptive Metropolis Algorithm, Bernoulli, Vol.7, No.2(2001), 223–242.

Liu, H., et al., A Unified Approach to Synchronization Problems over Closed Subgroups of the Orthogonal Group. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization(2023), 1018--1048.

Sun, Y., and Huang, Q., Pose Synchronization under Multiple Pair-Wise Relative Poses. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), (2023), 13072--13081.

Robinett, R. A., Orecchia, L., and Riesenfeld, S. J., Manifold Learning and Optimization Using Tangent Space Proxies. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12678, 2025.

Sun, L., Huang, Z., Chen, S., Yang, L., Ye, J., Su, S., and Yu, P. S., Multi-Domain Riemannian Graph Gluing for Building Graph Foundation Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.00618, 2026.

McRae, A. D., and Boumal, N., Benign Landscapes of Low-Dimensional Relaxations for Orthogonal Synchronization on General Graphs. SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 34, no. 2 (2024), 1427--1454.

Moakher, M., Means and Averaging in the Group of Rotations. SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, vol. 24, no. 1 (2002), 1--16.