Automated generation of disaster situation descriptions from GIS spatial data using LLMs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51094/jxiv.3805キーワード:
disaster data-to-text、 LLM hallucination control、 prompt engineering、 spatial data processing、 interpretation adequacy抄録
This study presents a pipeline for automatically generating natural-language descriptions of disaster situations from GIS spatial data using large language models (LLMs). The pipeline converts GeoJSON landslide distribution data and location reference information into structured JSON through spatial aggregation, which is then provided to an LLM to produce per-district damage descriptions. A verification module detects numerical errors and hallucinated content in the generated text. Through a controlled comparison of prompt conditions, this study demonstrates that prohibition instructions—explicit directives forbidding the model from introducing information not present in the input data—reduce hallucination (Noto: 33 to 21; Iburi: 5 to 3) and improve faithfulness (Noto: 3.60 to 4.64; Iburi: 3.84 to 4.76), without degrading fluency or style appropriateness. However, prohibition instructions also suppress qualitative interpretations of numerical data (Interpretation Adequacy: Noto 3.54 vs. 4.11; Iburi 3.54 vs. 4.20), revealing a trade-off between hallucination control and interpretive richness. A model scale comparison shows that 27–32B-parameter open models (4-bit quantization, locally executable) achieve practical quality with faithfulness above 4.6, whereas 7B-class models remain clearly below the 27–32B models and fall below 4.0 on the Noto dataset. The pipeline was applied without modification to the 2024 Noto Peninsula Earthquake (430 districts) and the 2018 Hokkaido Eastern Iburi Earthquake (51 districts), yielding comparable performance across these two landslide case studies.
利益相反に関する開示
The author declares no conflict of interest.ダウンロード *前日までの集計結果を表示します
引用文献
Central Disaster Management Council, Working Group on Disaster Response Based on the 2024 Noto Peninsula Earthquake: Report on the Disaster Response to the 2024 Noto Peninsula Earthquake, November 2024. (in Japanese)
Yao, S., Zhao, J., Yu, D., Du, N., Shafran, I., Narasimhan, K. and Cao, Y.: ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models, International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2023.
Schick, T., Dwivedi-Yu, J., Dessì, R., Raileanu, R., Lomeli, M., Hambro, E., Zettlemoyer, L., Cancedda, N. and Scialom, T.: Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), Vol. 36, pp. 68539–68551, 2023.
Chen, Z., Chen, W., Zha, H., Zhou, X., Zhang, Y., Sundaresan, S. and Wang, W.Y.: Logic2Text: High-Fidelity Natural Language Generation from Logical Forms, Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020, pp. 2096–2111, 2020.
Zhao, Y., Nan, L., Zhang, H., Si, S., Tang, X. and Cohan, A.: Investigating Table-to-Text Generation Capabilities of LLMs in Real-World Information Seeking Scenarios, arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14987, 2023.
Liu, Y., Iter, D., Xu, Y., Wang, S., Xu, R. and Zhu, C.: G-EVAL: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignment, Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 2511–2522, 2023.
Wei, J., Tay, Y., Bommasani, R., Raffel, C., Zoph, B., Borgeaud, S., Yogatama, D., Bosma, M., Zhou, D., Metzler, D., Chi, E.H., Hashimoto, T., Vinyals, O., Liang, P., Dean, J. and Fedus, W.: Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models, Transactions on Machine Learning Research (TMLR), 2022.
Zhou, G. and Mosalam, K.M.: Automated Virtual Earthquake Reconnaissance Reporting Using Natural Language Processing, Natural Hazards Review, 2025. DOI: 10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-2256.
Pierdicca, R., Muralikrishna, N., Tonetto, F. and Ghianda, A.: On the Use of LLMs for GIS-Based Spatial Analysis, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, Vol. 14, No. 10, 401, 2025.
Geospatial Information Authority of Japan (GSI): Landslide and debris-flow distribution maps for the 2024 Noto Peninsula Earthquake, https://www.gsi.go.jp/BOUSAI/20240101_noto_earthquake.html (accessed March 13, 2026). (in Japanese)
Geospatial Information Authority of Japan (GSI): Landslide and debris-flow distribution maps for the 2018 Hokkaido Eastern Iburi Earthquake, https://www.gsi.go.jp/BOUSAI/H30-hokkaidoiburi-east-earthquake-index.html (accessed March 13, 2026). (in Japanese)
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT): Position Reference Information Download Service, https://nlftp.mlit.go.jp/isj/ (accessed March 13, 2026). (in Japanese)
ダウンロード
公開済
投稿日時: 2026-04-04 05:26:04 UTC
公開日時: 2026-06-17 01:12:31 UTC
ライセンス
Copyright(c)2026
Yamamoto, Yoshiyuki
この作品は、Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licenseの下でライセンスされています。
